Mary L Phillips1, Henry W Chase, Yvette I Sheline, Amit Etkin, Jorge R C Almeida, Thilo Deckersbach, Madhukar H Trivedi. 1. From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh; the Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; the Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and the Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite significant advances in neuroscience and treatment development, no widely accepted biomarkers are available to inform diagnostics or identify preferred treatments for individuals with major depressive disorder. METHOD: In this critical review, the authors examine the extent to which multimodal neuroimaging techniques can identify biomarkers reflecting key pathophysiologic processes in depression and whether such biomarkers may act as predictors, moderators, and mediators of treatment response that might facilitate development of personalized treatments based on a better understanding of these processes. RESULTS: The authors first highlight the most consistent findings from neuroimaging studies using different techniques in depression, including structural and functional abnormalities in two parallel neural circuits: serotonergically modulated implicit emotion regulation circuitry, centered on the amygdala and different regions in the medial prefrontal cortex; and dopaminergically modulated reward neural circuitry, centered on the ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex. They then describe key findings from the relatively small number of studies indicating that specific measures of regional function and, to a lesser extent, structure in these neural circuits predict treatment response in depression. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations of existing studies include small sample sizes, use of only one neuroimaging modality, and a focus on identifying predictors rather than moderators and mediators of differential treatment response. By addressing these limitations and, most importantly, capitalizing on the benefits of multimodal neuroimaging, future studies can yield moderators and mediators of treatment response in depression to facilitate significant improvements in shorter- and longer-term clinical and functional outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Despite significant advances in neuroscience and treatment development, no widely accepted biomarkers are available to inform diagnostics or identify preferred treatments for individuals with major depressive disorder. METHOD: In this critical review, the authors examine the extent to which multimodal neuroimaging techniques can identify biomarkers reflecting key pathophysiologic processes in depression and whether such biomarkers may act as predictors, moderators, and mediators of treatment response that might facilitate development of personalized treatments based on a better understanding of these processes. RESULTS: The authors first highlight the most consistent findings from neuroimaging studies using different techniques in depression, including structural and functional abnormalities in two parallel neural circuits: serotonergically modulated implicit emotion regulation circuitry, centered on the amygdala and different regions in the medial prefrontal cortex; and dopaminergically modulated reward neural circuitry, centered on the ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex. They then describe key findings from the relatively small number of studies indicating that specific measures of regional function and, to a lesser extent, structure in these neural circuits predict treatment response in depression. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations of existing studies include small sample sizes, use of only one neuroimaging modality, and a focus on identifying predictors rather than moderators and mediators of differential treatment response. By addressing these limitations and, most importantly, capitalizing on the benefits of multimodal neuroimaging, future studies can yield moderators and mediators of treatment response in depression to facilitate significant improvements in shorter- and longer-term clinical and functional outcomes.
Authors: Y Chen; H I Wan; J P O'Reardon; D J J Wang; Z Wang; M Korczykowski; J A Detre Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-12-29 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: C J Honey; O Sporns; L Cammoun; X Gigandet; J P Thiran; R Meuli; P Hagmann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Giacomo Salvadore; Brian R Cornwell; Veronica Colon-Rosario; Richard Coppola; Christian Grillon; Carlos A Zarate; Husseini K Manji Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Björn H Schott; Luciano Minuzzi; Ruth M Krebs; David Elmenhorst; Markus Lang; Oliver H Winz; Constanze I Seidenbecher; Heinz H Coenen; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Karl Zilles; Emrah Düzel; Andreas Bauer Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Benjamin S C Wade; Jing Sui; Stephanie Njau; Amber M Leaver; Megha Vasvada; Boris A Gutman; Paul M Thompson; Randal Espinoza; Roger P Woods; Christopher C Abbott; Katherine L Narr; Shantanu H Joshi Journal: Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: Kevin P Nguyen; Cherise Chin Fatt; Alex Treacher; Cooper Mellema; Madhukar H Trivedi; Albert Montillo Journal: Predict Intell Med (2019) Date: 2019-10-10
Authors: Tsafrir Greenberg; Henry W Chase; Jorge R Almeida; Richelle Stiffler; Carlos R Zevallos; Haris A Aslam; Thilo Deckersbach; Sarah Weyandt; Crystal Cooper; Marisa Toups; Thomas Carmody; Benji Kurian; Scott Peltier; Phillip Adams; Melvin G McInnis; Maria A Oquendo; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Myrna Weissman; Ramin Parsey; Madhukar H Trivedi; Mary L Phillips Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Zengjian Wang; Xiaoyun Wang; Jian Liu; Jun Chen; Xian Liu; Guangning Nie; Kristen Jorgenson; Ki Cheul Sohn; Ruiwang Huang; Ming Liu; Bo Liu; Jian Kong Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Marc S Lener; Mark J Niciu; Elizabeth D Ballard; Minkyung Park; Lawrence T Park; Allison C Nugent; Carlos A Zarate Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 13.382