Literature DB >> 23348914

Docking of the da Vinci Si Surgical System® with single-site technology.

Pouya Iranmanesh1, Philippe Morel, Nicolas C Buchs, François Pugin, Francesco Volonte, Usha Seshadri Kreaden, Monika E Hagen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strategies to spare operating room (OR) times are crucial to limiting the costs involved in robotic surgery. Among other factors, the pre-operative set-up and docking phases have been incriminated at first to be time consuming. The docking process on the standard multiport da Vinci Surgical System has not been shown to significantly prolong the overall OR time. This study aims to analyse whether the length of the docking process on the new da Vinci Si Surgical System with Single-Site™ technology remains acceptable.
METHODS: We prospectively analysed all of the robotic single-incision cholecystectomies performed at our institution for docking and operating times during 2011-2012. The docking task load was assessed each time in a self-administered fashion by the docking surgeon using the NASA TLX visual scale.
RESULTS: Sixty-four robotic single-incision cholecystectomies were included and analysed. The mean operative time was 78 min. Two surgeons with previous robotic surgery experience and a group of three less experienced robotic surgeons were responsible for docking the system. They performed 45, 10 and nine dockings, respectively. The overall mean docking time was 6.4 min with no significant difference between the groups. The docking process represented approximately 8% of the operating time. The surgeon with the most procedures showed significant progress in his docking times. The different task load parameters did not show a statistical difference between the three groups, with the exception of the frustration parameter, which was higher in the group of less experienced surgeons. There were significant correlations between docking times and the assessment of the various task load parameters.
CONCLUSION: The docking process for a robotic single-incision cholecystectomy is learned rapidly and does not significantly increase the overall OR time.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348914     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  9 in total

1.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Early clinical experience with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System in general surgery.

Authors:  Monika E Hagen; Minoa K Jung; Frederic Ris; Jassim Fakhro; Nicolas C Buchs; Leo Buehler; Philippe Morel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Migliore; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Roberto Passera; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Robot-assisted surgery - Progress or expensive toy? : Matched-pair comparative analysis of robot-assisted cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  R Albrecht; D Haase; R Zippel; H Koch; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Advantages of the glove port docking technique in robotic single-site cholecystectomy: comparison with the conventional silicone port.

Authors:  Ji Wool Ko; Jin Woo Lee; Sung Won Kwon; Sung Hoon Choi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-21

6.  Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress.

Authors:  Shahida Bibi; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Jasna Coralic; Mohamed Bayoumi; Joubin Khorsand; Daniel T Farkas; Leela M Prasad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Real-time near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography could shorten operative time during robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Dan E Azagury; Minoa Jung; Francesco Volonte; Monika E Hagen; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: Advantages and limits.

Authors:  Nicola Pluchino; Nicolas C Buchs; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Jean Marie Wenger; Philippe Morel; Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-10-29

Review 9.  Current Concepts in Pediatric Robotic Assisted Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Ramphis A Morales-López; Marcos Pérez-Marchán; Marcos Pérez Brayfield
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.