Literature DB >> 26133910

Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress.

Shahida Bibi1, Amir A Rahnemai-Azar, Jasna Coralic, Mohamed Bayoumi, Joubin Khorsand, Daniel T Farkas, Leela M Prasad.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the learning curve and perioperative outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy during the first 102 cases by a single surgeon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed on the first 102 cases of single-site robotic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into five chronological groups based on the date of surgery, with 20 patients in each group except the 5th group which had 22 patients. The groups were compared by docking time, robotic dissection time, and overall surgery time. A P value of 0.05 was used as statistically significant.
RESULTS: The female to male ratio was 2:1. The mean age was 51 years (18-87) and the mean BMI was 28.26 (18-41). Overall, 69 % of the patients underwent elective cholecystectomy and 31 % required urgent surgery. In all, 17 % of patients had previous abdominal surgeries. In total, 45 % of procedures were regarded as same day surgery. The total mean length of stay was 1.97 days (0-8). The mean operative time was 110 min (36-265), mean robotic console time 70 min (26-179), and mean docking time 9 min (1-26). The overall conversion rate was 3.9 % and the complication rate was 4 %. The docking time, robotic time, and average operative time were significantly different in the first group as compared to the remaining the five groups (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Single-site robotic cholecystectomy is safe in both elective and urgent conditions, and in patients with previous abdominal surgeries. It has a short learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133910     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3135-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology.

Authors:  Andrea Pietrabissa; Fabio Sbrana; Luca Morelli; Francesco Badessi; Luigi Pugliese; Alessio Vinci; Catherine Klersy; Giuseppe Spinoglio
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

2.  Robotics may overcome technical limitations of single-trocar surgery: an experimental prospective study of Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Pierre Allemann; Joel Leroy; Mitsuhiro Asakuma; Fahad Al Abeidi; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03

3.  Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms.

Authors:  Anthony Michael Gonzalez; Jorge Rafael Rabaza; Charan Donkor; Rey Jesús Romero; Radomir Kosanovic; Juan Carlos Verdeja
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Bilateral robotic single-site partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ill Young Seo; Joung Sik Rim
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which technique, which surgeon, for which patient? A study of the implementation in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  D Mutter; C Callari; M Diana; B Dallemagne; J Leroy; J Marescaux
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 6.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Authors:  A K-Y Fung; E H Aly
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Philippe Morel; Nicolas C Buchs; Pouya Iranmanesh; François Pugin; Leo Buehler; Dan E Azagury; Minoa Jung; Francesco Volonte; Monika E Hagen
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.027

9.  Learning curve and early clinical outcomes for a robotic surgery novice performing robotic single site cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Andrew A Angus; Saad L Sahi; Bruce B McIntosh
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.547

10.  Comparison of clinical safety and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min-Wei Zhou; Xiao-Dong Gu; Jian-Bin Xiang; Zong-You Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-14
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery.

Authors:  Luise I M Pernar; Faith C Robertson; Ali Tavakkoli; Eric G Sheu; David C Brooks; Douglas S Smink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Migliore; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Roberto Passera; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery. German version].

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  The emerging role for robotics in cholecystectomy: the dawn of a new era?

Authors:  Jessica A Zaman; Tejender Paul Singh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Colectomy Results in Increased Operative Time Without Improved Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian Ezekian; Zhifei Sun; Mohamed A Adam; Jina Kim; Megan C Turner; Brian F Gilmore; Cecilia T Ong; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Reinisch; Juliane Liese; Winfried Padberg; Frank Ulrich
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

9.  European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde; Andrea Peeters; Yannick M Meyer; Stavros A Antoniou; Isaías Alarcón Del Agua; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Amir Ben Yehuda; Luigi Boni; Elisa Cassinotti; Giovanni Dapri; Tao Yang; Sofie Fransen; Antonello Forgione; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Michele Mazzola; Marco Migliore; Christof Mittermair; Doris Mittermair; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Andrea Morlacchi; Eran Nizri; Myrthe Nuijts; Jonas Raakow; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Amir Szold; Helmut Weiss; Michael Weiss; Ricardo Zorron; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Emergency robotic colorectal surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case series study.

Authors:  Vicky Maertens; Samuel Stefan; Emma Rawlinson; Chris Ball; Paul Gibbs; Stuart Mercer; Jim S Khan
Journal:  Laparosc Endosc Robot Surg       Date:  2022-03-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.