Literature DB >> 29943057

Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review.

Marco Migliore1, Alberto Arezzo2, Simone Arolfo1, Roberto Passera3, Mario Morino1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) is the gold standard technique for cholecystectomy. In order to reduce postoperative pain and improve cosmetic results, the application of the single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) technique was introduced, leading surgeons to face important challenges. Robotic technology has been proposed to overcome some of these limitations. The purpose of this review is to assess the safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC) for benign disease.
METHODS: An Embase and Pubmed literature search was performed in February 2017. Randomized controlled trial and prospective observational studies were selected and assessed using PRISMA recommendations. Primary outcome was overall postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes were postoperative bile leak rate, total conversion rate, operative time, wound complication rate, postoperative hospital stay, and port site hernia rate. The outcomes were analyzed in Forest plots based on fixed and random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies provided data about 1010 patients who underwent to SIRC for benign disease of gallbladder. Overall postoperative complications rate was 11.6% but only 4/1010 (0.4%) patients required further surgery. A postoperative bile leak was reported in 3/950 patients (0.3%). Conversion occurred in 4.2% of patients. Mean operative time was 86.7 min including an average of 42 min should be added as for robotic console time. Wound complications occurred in 3.7% of patients. Median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day. Port site hernia at the latest follow-up available was reported in 5.2% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Da Vinci robot in single-port cholecystectomy seems to have similar results in terms of incidence and grade of complications compared to standard laparoscopy. In addition, it seems affected by the same limitations of single-port surgery, consisting of an increased operative time and incidence of port site hernia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Robotic cholecystectomy; Single site; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29943057     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6300-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  59 in total

1.  First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform.

Authors:  Matthew Kroh; Kevin El-Hayek; Steven Rosenblatt; Bipan Chand; Pedro Escobar; Jihad Kaouk; Sricharan Chalikonda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations.

Authors:  S Duca; O Bãlã; N Al-Hajjar; C Lancu; I C Puia; D Munteanu; F Graur
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Port closure techniques.

Authors:  Z Shaher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Banujan Balachandran; Theadore A Hufford; Taha Mustafa; Kunal Kochar; Suela Sulo; Joubin Khorsand
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Gennaro Nuzzo; Felice Giuliante; Ivo Giovannini; Francesco Ardito; Fabrizio D'Acapito; Maria Vellone; Marino Murazio; Giovanni Capelli
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-10

9.  Dropped gallstone as a nidus of intra-abdominal abscess complicated by empyema.

Authors:  Dustin J Roberts; Helen M Chun
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Philippe Morel; Nicolas C Buchs; Pouya Iranmanesh; François Pugin; Leo Buehler; Dan E Azagury; Minoa Jung; Francesco Volonte; Monika E Hagen
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.027

View more
  8 in total

1.  Feasibility and Efficacy of Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SP® Platform.

Authors:  Wan-Joon Kim; Sae-Byeol Choi; Wan-Bae Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 2.  [Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES].

Authors:  M Berlet; A Jell; D Bulian; H Friess; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

4.  A Comparative Study of Needlescopic Grasper Assisted Single Incision versus Three-Port versus Pure Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Chai-Won Kim; Soo-Ho Lee; Kee-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-12-15

5.  Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sun Min Lee; Jin Hong Lim
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-02-28

6.  Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic.

Authors:  Kyu Min Lee; Dae Hun Han; Seoung Yoon Roh; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-09-15

7.  A Comparative Study of Needlescopic Grasper Assisted Single Incision versus Three Port versus Pure Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Bum-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-12-15

8.  Early Outcomes of Robotic Single Site Cholecystectomy Using the DaVinci Xi® System.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Jang; Sung Hwa Kang; Kwan Woo Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.