Literature DB >> 10866198

Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males.

T Pizzari1, T R Birkhead.   

Abstract

Paternity is often determined by competition between the ejaculates of different males. Males can also use particular behaviours or structures to manipulate how females use sperm. However, the ability of females to bias sperm utilization in favour of preferred males independently of male manipulation has not been demonstrated. Females are predicted to respond differentially to the sperm of different males when the reproductive interests of the sexes differ and when females are coerced into copulating. Here we show that in female feral fowl most copulations are coerced, and that females consistently bias sperm retention in favour of the preferred male phenotype. Females prefer to copulate with dominant males, but when sexually coerced by subordinate males, they manipulate the behaviour of dominant males to reduce the likelihood of insemination. If this fails, females differentially eject ejaculates according to male status in the absence of any male manipulation and preferentially retain the sperm of dominant males.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10866198     DOI: 10.1038/35015558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  63 in total

1.  Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?

Authors:  J A Andrés; G Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Indirect partner choice through manipulation of male behaviour by female fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  T Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  David P Froman; Tommaso Pizzari; Allen J Feltmann; Hector Castillo-Juarez; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental analysis of sperm competition mechanisms in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Gábor Michl; János Török; Simon C Griffith; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect.

Authors:  N Wedell; B Karlsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Male phenotype predicts insemination success in guppies.

Authors:  Andrea Pilastro; Jonathan P Evans; Silvia Sartorelli; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A novel test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis reveals independent components of fertility.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Per Jensen; Charles K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sexual conflict and the function of genitalic claws in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Yun Yun Cheng; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Female choice of young sperm in a genetically monogamous bird.

Authors:  Richard H Wagner; Fabrice Helfenstein; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.