Literature DB >> 29255016

Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Grant C McDonald1, Tommaso Pizzari2.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is a fundamental evolutionary process but remains debated, particularly in the complexity of polyandrous populations where females mate with multiple males. This lack of resolution is partly because studies have largely ignored the structure of the sexual network, that is, the pattern of mate sharing. Here, we quantify what we call mating assortment with network analysis to specify explicitly the indirect as well as direct relationships between partners. We first review empirical studies, showing that mating assortment varies considerably in nature, due largely to basic properties of the sexual network (size and density) and partly to nonrandom patterns of mate sharing. We then use simulations to show how variation in mating assortment interacts with population-level polyandry to determine the strength of sexual selection on males. Controlling for average polyandry, positive mating assortment, arising when more polygynous males tend to mate with more polyandrous females, drastically decreases the intensity of precopulatory sexual selection on male mating success (Bateman gradient) and the covariance between male mating success and postcopulatory paternity share. Average polyandry independently weakened some measures of sexual selection and crucially also impacted sexual selection indirectly by constraining mating assortment through the saturation of the mating network. Mating assortment therefore represents a key-albeit overlooked-modulator of the strength of sexual selection. Our results show that jointly considering sexual network structure and average polyandry more precisely describes the strength of sexual selection.

Keywords:  Bateman gradient; SCIC; mating system; opportunity for selection; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255016      PMCID: PMC5776794          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710450115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  60 in total

1.  Male reproductive senescence causes potential for sexual conflict over mating.

Authors:  Rebecca Dean; Charlie K Cornwallis; Hanne Løvlie; Kirsty Worley; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates.

Authors:  Jessica C Flack; Michelle Girvan; Frans B M de Waal; David C Krakauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Measuring the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Piecing together female extra-pair mate choice: females really do prefer more ornamented males.

Authors:  Sarah J Wells; Rebecca J Safran; James Dale
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Darren P Croft; Jens Krause; Richard James
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF PAIRING SUCCESS, EXTRA-PAIR COPULATIONS AND MATE QUALITY ON THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SEXUAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Michael S Webster; Stephen Pruett-Jones; David F Westneat; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sexual selection leads to a tenfold difference in reproductive success of alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Cédric Tentelier; Olivier Lepais; Nicolas Larranaga; Aurélie Manicki; Frédéric Lange; Jacques Rives
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-05-23

Review 8.  Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds.

Authors:  Lucy M Aplin; Damien R Farine; Julie Morand-Ferron; Andrew Cockburn; Alex Thornton; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.

Authors:  Julie M Collet; Rebecca F Dean; Kirsty Worley; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ageing via perception costs of reproduction magnifies sexual selection.

Authors:  Roberto García-Roa; Manuel Serra; Pau Carazo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals.

Authors:  Julia D Monk; Erin Giglio; Ambika Kamath; Max R Lambert; Caitlin E McDonough
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Female control over multiple matings increases the opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sex peptide receptor-regulated polyandry modulates the balance of pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Grant C McDonald; Emelia Smith; Damian T Smith; Jennifer C Perry; Tracey Chapman; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Hermaphroditism promotes mate diversity in flowering plants.

Authors:  Dorothy A Christopher; Randall J Mitchell; Dorset W Trapnell; Patrick A Smallwood; Wendy R Semski; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.844

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.