Literature DB >> 30900533

Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.

Dean M Castillo1,2, Leonie C Moyle1.   

Abstract

Sexual selection can accelerate speciation by driving the evolution of reproductive isolation, but forces driving speciation could also reciprocally feedback on sexual selection. This might be particularly important in the context of 'reinforcement', where selection acts directly to increase prezygotic barriers to reduce the cost of heterospecific matings. Using assays of sperm competition within and between two sister species, we show a signature of reinforcement where these species interact: populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura that co-occur with sister species D. persimilis have an elevated ability to outcompete heterospecific sperm, consistent with selection for increased postcopulatory isolation. We also find these D. pseudoobscura populations have decreased sperm competitive ability against conspecifics, reducing the opportunity for sexual selection within these populations. Our findings demonstrate that direct selection to increase reproductive isolation against other species can compromise the efficacy of sexual selection within species, a collateral effect of reproductive traits responding to heterospecific interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  sexual selection; speciation; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30900533      PMCID: PMC6452082          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  62 in total

1.  Transgenic tools for members of the genus Drosophila with sequenced genomes.

Authors:  Stacy Holtzman; David Miller; Robert Eisman; Hisashi Kuwayama; Teruyuki Niimi; Thomas Kaufman
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 2.  Sexual selection and mate choice.

Authors:  Malte Andersson; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Virginie Ravigné
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Brooke E White; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Emily R Bewick; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Behavioral Isolation due to Cascade Reinforcement in Lucania Killifish.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Genevieve Roland; Clare Rankhorn; Amy Falater; Emma L Berdan; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  M A Noor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evolution of premating reproductive isolation among conspecific populations of the sea rock-pool beetle Ochthebius urbanelliae driven by reinforcing natural selection.

Authors:  Daniele Porretta; Sandra Urbanelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Time in a bottle: the evolutionary fate of species discrimination in sibling Drosophila species.

Authors:  Erin M Myers; W Anthony Frankino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evolutionary rate covariation identifies new members of a protein network required for Drosophila melanogaster female post-mating responses.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Findlay; Jessica L Sitnik; Wenke Wang; Charles F Aquadro; Nathan L Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing.

Authors:  Rob J Kulathinal; Laurie S Stevison; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.

Authors:  Jenn M Coughlan; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.

Authors:  Martin D Garlovsky; Leeban H Yusuf; Michael G Ritchie; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Rapid divergence of a gamete recognition gene promoted macroevolution of Eutheria.

Authors:  Emma K Roberts; Steve Tardif; Emily A Wright; Roy N Platt; Robert D Bradley; Daniel M Hardy
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 17.906

6.  Conflict over fertilization underlies the transient evolution of reinforcement.

Authors:  Catherine A Rushworth; Alison M Wardlaw; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 9.593

7.  Rapid divergence of the male reproductive proteins in the Drosophila dunni group and implications for postmating incompatibilities between species.

Authors:  Tom Hill; Hazel-Lynn Rosales-Stephens; Robert L Unckless
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.