Literature DB >> 23338723

Transcatheter valve-in-valve therapies: patient selection, prosthesis assessment and selection, results, and future directions.

Manuel Wilbring1, Konstantin Alexiou, Sems-Malte Tugtekin, Bjoern Sill, Gregor Simonis, Klaus Matschke, Utz Kappert.   

Abstract

The development of transcatheter valve implantations (TAVI) has induced profound changes in the treatment of valvular heart disease over the past decade. At the same time, due to excellent clinical results, bioprostheses continuously outperformed mechanical prostheses. The increasing number of elderly patients has led to numerous patients presenting with deteriorated bioprostheses needing reoperation. In selected high-risk patients or patients with unreasonable surgical risk, valve-in-valve TAVI has advanced to a viable alternative to conventional redo surgery. High procedural success, good hemodynamics and acceptable clinical results were reported up until now. Valve-in-valve TAVI seems to be safe and effective in treatment of deteriorated valve prostheses in high-risk patients. The valve-in-valve concept presents the next step toward an individual treatment strategy for patients at prohibitive risk for conventional surgery. Present studies were reviewed with special concern to patient selection, prosthesis assessment, device selection, clinical outcome and technical challenging aspects as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23338723     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-012-0341-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  42 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  Ronen Gurvitch; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; David A Wood; Alexander B Willson; Stefan Toggweiler; Ronald Binder; John G Webb
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Holger Eggebrecht; Ulrich Schäfer; Hendrik Treede; Peter Boekstegers; Jörg Babin-Ebell; Markus Ferrari; Helge Möllmann; Helmut Baumgartner; Thierry Carrel; Philipp Kahlert; Philipp Lange; Thomas Walther; Raimund Erbel; Rajendra H Mehta; Matthias Thielmann
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for stenosed and regurgitant aortic valve bioprostheses CoreValve for failed bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.

Authors:  Muhammed Z Khawaja; Peter Haworth; Azad Ghuran; Lorraine Lee; Adam de Belder; Neville Hutchinson; Uday Trivedi; Jean-Claude Laborde; David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  A question of clinical reliability: observed versus EuroSCORE-predicted mortality after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Tamer Ghazy; Utz Kappert; Ahmed Ouda; Diana Conen; Klaus Matschke
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2010-01

5.  Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-valve implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Jörg Kempfert; Johannes M Blumenstein; Michael A Borger; Axel Linke; Sven Lehmann; Patrick Pritzwald-Stegmann; Michael W A Chu; Gerhard Schuler; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Thomas Walther
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Transcatheter percutaneous and transapical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  John G Webb; Sam Lichtenstein
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007

7.  Transapical aortic valve implantation in 100 consecutive patients: comparison to propensity-matched conventional aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Thomas Walther; Gerhard Schuler; Michael A Borger; Jörg Kempfert; Jörg Seeburger; Yvonne Rückert; Jörg Ender; Axel Linke; Markus Scholz; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve: from concept to clinical application and evaluation (part 2).

Authors:  Nicolo Piazza; Sabine Bleiziffer; Gernot Brockmann; Ruge Hendrick; Marcus-André Deutsch; Anke Opitz; Domenico Mazzitelli; Peter Tassani-Prell; Christian Schreiber; Rüdiger Lange
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Single-center comparative outcomes of the Edwards SAPIEN and Medtronic Melody transcatheter heart valves in the pulmonary position.

Authors:  Nadeen Faza; Damien Kenny; Clifford Kavinsky; Zahid Amin; Mary Heitschmidt; Ziyad M Hijazi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.

Authors:  Ali N Azadani; Nicolas Jaussaud; Peter B Matthews; Timothy A M Chuter; Liang Ge; T Sloane Guy; Julius Guccione; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2009-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) for active infective endocarditis: a case report.

Authors:  Kimiaki Okada; Yoshito Inoue; Hirofumi Haida; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-12

Review 2.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.

Authors:  Ross M Reul; Mahesh K Ramchandani; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.