| Literature DB >> 22078426 |
Ronen Gurvitch1, Anson Cheung, Jian Ye, David A Wood, Alexander B Willson, Stefan Toggweiler, Ronald Binder, John G Webb.
Abstract
When bioprosthetic cardiac valves fail, reoperative valve replacement carries a higher risk of morbidity and mortality compared with initial valve replacement. Transcatheter heart valve implantation may be a viable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for high-risk patients with native aortic stenosis, and valve-in-valve (V-in-V) implantation has been successfully performed for failed surgical bioprostheses in the aortic, mitral, pulmonic, and tricuspid positions. Despite some core similarities to transcatheter therapy of native valve disease, V-in-V therapy poses unique clinical and anatomic challenges. In this paper, we review the challenges, selection criteria, techniques, and outcomes of V-in-V implantation. Copyright ÂEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22078426 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094