BACKGROUND: Breast carcinoma prevention trials must recruit large cohorts of women who have an above-average risk of developing breast carcinoma. Recruitment for the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial required volunteers to complete a risk assessment questionnaire form (RAF). Women whose estimated risk of developing breast carcinoma in the next 5 years was > or = 1.67% based on the Gail model were invited to participate in STAR. Less than 4% of participants in the previously conducted P1 (tamoxifen vs. placebo) trial were minority women. We, therefore, studied barriers to minority participation in STAR among black, white, and Hispanic women who completed an RAF. METHODS: The authors analyzed the association of Gail model risk factors, education, and insurance with race/ethnicity using chi-square tests and two-sided P values. They developed logistic regression models of trial eligibility, controlling for the Gail model risk factors, education, and insurance status. RESULTS: Among 823 women who completed an RAF, white women were 10 times as likely as Hispanic women and 45 times as likely as black women to be eligible for STAR. Age at first birth (P = 0.04), having an affected first-degree relative (P < 0.0001), having had a biopsy (P < 0.0001), education (P < 0.0001), and insurance status (P < 0.0001) varied by race/ethnicity. All variables except insurance status were associated with eligibility when race was excluded from the model. In a model that included race/ethnicity, the same factors remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that both the race/ethnicity adjustment and socioeconomic factors were barriers to eligibility for and contribute to low minority participation in breast cancer prevention trials.
BACKGROUND:Breast carcinoma prevention trials must recruit large cohorts of women who have an above-average risk of developing breast carcinoma. Recruitment for the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial required volunteers to complete a risk assessment questionnaire form (RAF). Women whose estimated risk of developing breast carcinoma in the next 5 years was > or = 1.67% based on the Gail model were invited to participate in STAR. Less than 4% of participants in the previously conducted P1 (tamoxifen vs. placebo) trial were minority women. We, therefore, studied barriers to minority participation in STAR among black, white, and Hispanic women who completed an RAF. METHODS: The authors analyzed the association of Gail model risk factors, education, and insurance with race/ethnicity using chi-square tests and two-sided P values. They developed logistic regression models of trial eligibility, controlling for the Gail model risk factors, education, and insurance status. RESULTS: Among 823 women who completed an RAF, white women were 10 times as likely as Hispanic women and 45 times as likely as black women to be eligible for STAR. Age at first birth (P = 0.04), having an affected first-degree relative (P < 0.0001), having had a biopsy (P < 0.0001), education (P < 0.0001), and insurance status (P < 0.0001) varied by race/ethnicity. All variables except insurance status were associated with eligibility when race was excluded from the model. In a model that included race/ethnicity, the same factors remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that both the race/ethnicity adjustment and socioeconomic factors were barriers to eligibility for and contribute to low minority participation in breast cancer prevention trials.
Authors: Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew Journal: Breast J Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Myra G Schneider; Christopher J Swearingen; Lisa M Shulman; Jian Ye; Mona Baumgarten; Barbara C Tilley Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2008-08-09 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Lisa L Barnes; Raj C Shah; Neelum T Aggarwal; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Kari B Wisinski; Adrienne Faerber; Stephanie Wagner; Thomas C Havighurst; Jane A McElroy; Kyungmann Kim; Howard H Bailey Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2013-04-11
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Ann Ogden Gaffney; A Corina Aycinena; Pam Koch; Isobel Contento; Wahida Karmally; John M Richardson; Zaixing Shi; Emerson Lim; Wei-Yann Tsai; Regina M Santella; William S Blaner; Robin D Clugston; Serge Cremers; Susan Pollak; Iryna Sirosh; Katherine D Crew; Matthew Maurer; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Worta McCaskill-Stevens; John W Wilson; Elise D Cook; Cora L Edwards; Regina V Gibson; Diane L McElwain; Colmar D Figueroa-Moseley; Electra D Paskett; Noma L Roberson; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 2.486