Literature DB >> 12671020

Estimates of the number of US women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Andrew N Freedman1, Barry I Graubard, Sowmya R Rao, Worta McCaskill-Stevens, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, Mitchell H Gail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial demonstrated that tamoxifen treatment produced a 49% reduction in the risk of invasive breast cancer among women at elevated risk for the disease. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) subsequently approved tamoxifen for women aged 35 years or older with a 5-year breast cancer risk of 1.67% or higher for breast cancer chemoprevention. However, tamoxifen use has been associated with adverse outcomes, and not all eligible women have a positive benefit/risk ratio.
METHODS: We used weighted data from the year 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Module to estimate the total number of U.S. women, aged 35-79 years, who were eligible for tamoxifen chemoprevention based on the FDA eligibility criteria. We also estimated the numbers of white and black women who would benefit from tamoxifen chemoprevention on the basis of a positive benefit/risk index developed by Gail et al.
RESULTS: Of the 65,826,074 women aged 35-79 years without reported breast cancer in the United States in 2000, 10,232 816 women (15.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.7% to 16.3%) would be eligible for tamoxifen chemoprevention. The percentage of U.S. women who would be eligible varied dramatically by race, with 18.7% (95% CI = 17.8% to 19.7%) of white women, 5.7% (95% CI = 4.3% to 7.5%) of black women, and 2.9% (95% CI = 2.1% to 3.9%) of Hispanic women being eligible. Of the 50,104,829 white U.S. women aged 35-79 years, 2,431,911 (4.9%, 95% CI = 4.3% to 5.4%) would have a positive benefit/risk index for tamoxifen chemoprevention. Of the 7,481,779 black U.S. women aged 35-79 years, only 42,768 (0.6%, 95% CI = 0.2% to 1.3%) would have a positive benefit/risk index. Among white women, 28,492 (95% CI = 24,693 to 32,292) breast cancers would be prevented or deferred if those women who have a positive net benefit index took tamoxifen over the next 5 years.
CONCLUSION: A substantial percentage of U.S. women would be eligible for tamoxifen chemoprevention according to FDA criteria, but a much smaller percentage would have an estimated net benefit. Nevertheless, this latter percentage corresponds to more than two million women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12671020     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/95.7.526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  78 in total

Review 1.  Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary E Ropka; Jess Keim; John T Philbrick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Usability Testing of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Multi-Ethnic Women.

Authors:  Austin M Coe; William Ueng; Jennifer M Vargas; Raven David; Alejandro Vanegas; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Haeseung Yi; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

6.  Estimation and interpretation of models of absolute risk from epidemiologic data, including family-based studies.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Physical activity, weight control, and breast cancer risk and survival: clinical trial rationale and design considerations.

Authors:  Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Sally Hunsberger; Marianne H Alciati; Steven N Blair; Pamela J Goodwin; Anne McTiernan; Rena Wing; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Elizabeth Matos Gomez; Elissa Clayton; Sharon Tollin; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee; John V Kiluk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijayan Nair; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Sharon Hensley Alford; Paula Lantz; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Claud Zweig; Rosemarie Pitsch; Aleksandra Jankovic; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Barriers and Facilitators to Patient-Provider Communication When Discussing Breast Cancer Risk to Aid in the Development of Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Haeseung Yi; Tong Xiao; Parijatham S Thomas; Alejandra N Aguirre; Cindy Smalletz; Jill Dimond; Joseph Finkelstein; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Raven David; Jennifer Vargas; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.