Literature DB >> 30739270

Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.

Aisha T Langford1, Sarah T Hawley2, Sue Stableford3, Jamie L Studts4, Margaret M Byrne5.   

Abstract

Despite the promise of clinical trials for improving cancer care, less than 5% of all cancer patients participate. Racial/ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). To address this gap, we developed a plain language, web-based decision support tool (CHOICES DST) in English and Spanish to support decision-making about CCTs among Blacks and Hispanics. In phase 1 (information collection), we conducted qualitative interviews with 45 cancer patients, completed a thorough literature review, and reviewed results from a telephone survey of 1100 cancer patients. In phase 2 (content generation), we created the first iteration of the CHOICES DST. In phase 3 (usability testing), we gathered user experience and acceptability data from a small sample of cancer survivors (n = 9). The Knowledge, Empowerment, and Values Clarification (KEV) model of decision-making was developed based on data from phase 1. The KEV model and other phase 1 data allowed us to create the CHOICES DST platform. Usability testing of the CHOICES DST showed highly favorable responses from users, satisfaction with content, ease of navigation, and a desire to use the tool. Qualitative results identified addressable points that would benefit from content and navigation-related alterations. The final version of the CHOICES DST was well received and understood by Black and Hispanic participants, and adheres to the mandates for plain language communication. This research provides preliminary data that CHOICES DST holds promise for improving knowledge of CCTs and potentially improving informed decision-making about participation in trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; Cancer survivors; Choice behavior; Clinical trials as topic; Comprehension; Decision making; Hispanic Americans; Internet; Neoplasms; Patient participation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30739270      PMCID: PMC9575516          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   1.771


  35 in total

1.  A national cancer clinical trials system for the 21st century: reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program.

Authors:  John F Scoggins; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Plain language: a strategic response to the health literacy challenge.

Authors:  Sue Stableford; Wendy Mettger
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.222

3.  Psychosocial barriers contributing to the under-representation of racial/ethnic minorities in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Anjanette A Wells; Brad Zebrack
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in clinical trial enrollment, refusal rates, ineligibility, and reasons for decline among patients at sites in the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; Eileen P Dimond; Andrea M Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Rebecca A Enos; Angela Carrigan; Kathy Wilkinson; Ronald S Go
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans' participation in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Desiree Rivers; Euna M August; Ivana Sehovic; B Lee Green; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS): beyond decision aids to usual design of patient education materials.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Clinical trial awareness: Changes over time and sociodemographic disparities.

Authors:  Amanda Leiter; Michael A Diefenbach; John Doucette; William K Oh; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 9.  Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Seonaidh C Cotton; Jamie C Brehaut; Mary C Politi; Zoe Skea
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-27

10.  Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Dawn Stacey; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  2 in total

1.  Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Catherine A O'Brian; Laura Tom; Q Eileen Wafford; Shenita Mack; Samuel R Mendez; Magdalena Nava; Rabih Dahdouh; Rachelle Paul-Brutus; Kathryn H Carpenter; Barbara Kern; Kristi L Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Unpacking Trial Offers and Low Accrual Rates: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinic Visits With Physicians and Patients Potentially Eligible for a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lauren M Hamel; David W Dougherty; Terrance L Albrecht; Mark Wojda; Alice Jordan; Tanina F Moore; Nicole Senft; Michael Carducci; Elisabeth I Heath; Mark A Manning; Louis A Penner; Seongho Kim; Susan Eggly
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-12-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.