Literature DB >> 23333186

Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.

Mohamed Marwan1, Carina Mettin, Tobias Pflederer, Martin Seltmann, Annika Schuhbäck, Gerd Muschiol, Dieter Ropers, Werner G Daniel, Stephan Achenbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective radiation dose from a single coronary artery calcification CT scan can range from 0.8 to 10.5 mSv, depending on the protocol. Reducing the effective radiation dose to reasonable levels without affecting diagnostic image quality can result in substantial dose reduction in CT.
OBJECTIVES: We prospectively compared tube voltages of 120 and 100 kV in a low-dose CT acquisition protocol for measuring coronary artery calcified plaque with prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition.
METHODS: In 150 consecutive patients, measurement of coronary artery calcified plaque was performed with prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Imaging was first done with tube voltage of 120 kV voltage and subsequently repeated with 100 kV and otherwise unchanged parameters. CT was performed with a dual-source CT system with 280 milliseconds of rotation time, 2 × 128 slices, pitch of 3.4, triggered at 60% of the R-R interval. Tube current for both protocols was set at 80 mAs. With the use of a medium sharp reconstruction kernel (Siemens B35f), cross-sectional images were reconstructed with 3.0-mm slice thickness and 1.5-mm increment. Agatston scores were determined per patient for both scan settings by 2 independent readers with the use of a standard threshold of 130 HU for calcium detection. In addition, the Agatston score was calculated with a previously proposed threshold of 147 HU for 100-kV acquisitions.
RESULTS: Mean image noise was 20 ± 5 and 27 ± 7 for 120 and 100 kV, respectively (P < 0.0001). Mean dose length product was 24 ± 6 cm · cGy for the 120-kV protocol and 14 ± 4 cm · cGy for the 100-kV protocol, corresponding to average estimated effective doses of 0.3 and 0.2 mSv (P < 0.0001). Five patients were excluded from the analysis. In the remaining 145 patients, using the standard tube voltage of 120 kV, any coronary calcium was detected in 76 identical patients by both observers. In 75 of these patients, calcium was also identified by both observers in 100-kV data sets, whereas 1 patient was scored negative by 1 reader and was assigned an Agatston score of 0.7 (threshold, 130 HU) and 0.2 (threshold, 147 HU) by the other. Interobserver disagreement for assigning a patient a zero Agatston score was the same for both scan settings (each 4 patients). The mean Agatston scores for 120-kV and 100-kV (threshold, 147 HU) scans were 105 ± 245 (range, 0-1865) and 116 ± 261 (range, 0-1917), respectively (P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis indicated a systematic overestimation of the Agatston score with tube voltage of 100 kV and threshold of 147 HU (mean difference, 11; 95% limits of agreement, 62 to -40). Similar results were observed for coronary calcium volume scores.
CONCLUSION: High-pitch spiral acquisition allows coronary calcium scoring with effective doses below 0.5 mSv. The use of 100-kV tube voltage further reduces effective radiation dose compared with the standard of 120 kV; however, it leads to significant overestimation of the Agatston score when the standard threshold of 130 HU is used. Adjusting the threshold to 147 HU leads to a better agreement compared with standard 120 kV protocols yet with a remaining systematic bias toward overestimation of the Agatston score. For high-pitch spiral acquisition mode, effective radiation dose reduction when using a 100-kV setting is minimal compared with the standard 120-kV setting and may be considered nonsignificant in a clinical setting.
Copyright © 2013 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23333186     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  17 in total

1.  Temporal averaging for analysis of four-dimensional whole-heart computed tomography perfusion of the myocardium: proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  S Feger; A Shaban; S Lukas; C Kendziorra; M Rief; E Zimmermann; M Dewey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Ultra-low-dose computed tomography for attenuation correction of cadmium-zinc-telluride single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Marvin Grossmann; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Fabiola A Bechtiger; Michael Messerli; Moritz Schwyzer; Dominik C Benz; Ken Kudura; Catherine Gebhard; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Georg Apfaltrer; Moritz H Albrecht; U Joseph Schoepf; Taylor M Duguay; Carlo N De Cecco; John W Nance; Domenico De Santis; Paul Apfaltrer; Marwen H Eid; Chelsea D Eason; Zachary M Thompson; Maximilian J Bauer; Akos Varga-Szemes; Brian E Jacobs; Erich Sorantin; Christian Tesche
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Annemarie M den Harder; Martin J Willemink; Ronald L A W Bleys; Pim A de Jong; Ricardo P J Budde; Arnold M R Schilham; Tim Leiner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Technical Note: kV-independent coronary calcium scoring: A phantom evaluation of score accuracy and potential radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Shengzhen Tao; Emily Sheedy; Michael Bruesewitz; Nikkole Weber; Kyle Williams; Ahmed Halaweish; Bernhard Schmidt; Eric Williamson; Cynthia McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Reny Luhur; Joanne D Schuijf; Jürgen Mews; Jörg Blobel; Bernd Hamm; Alexander Lembcke
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Single low-dose CT scan optimized for rest-stress PET attenuation correction and quantification of coronary artery calcium.

Authors:  Tyler S Kaster; Girish Dwivedi; Leah Susser; Jennifer M Renaud; Rob S B Beanlands; Benjamin J W Chow; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Cigarette smoking and cardiovascular events: role of inflammation and subclinical atherosclerosis from the MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Michael J Blaha; Andrew P DeFilippis; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke; W Gregory Hundley; James K Min; Leslee J Shaw; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; R Graham Barr; Matthew J Budoff; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 8.311

9.  Declining radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography: German cardiac CT registry experience 2009-2014.

Authors:  Axel Schmermund; Mohamed Marwan; Jörg Hausleiter; Sebastian Barth; Oliver Bruder; Sebastian Kerber; Grigorius Korosoglou; Alexander Leber; Werner Moshage; Stephen Schröder; Steffen Schneider; Jochen Senges; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  A comparison of Diamond Forrester and coronary calcium scores as gatekeepers for investigations of stable chest pain.

Authors:  Peter McKavanagh; Lisa Lusk; Peter A Ball; Tom R Trinick; Ellie Duly; Gerard M Walls; Clare Orr; Mark T Harbinson; Patrick M Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.