BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium is an important marker of coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using PET-CT technology requires a CT scan for attenuation correction (CTAC) but is not used routinely to measure coronary calcium burden. This study aimed to determine if a low-dose CTAC scan can also accurately quantify coronary artery calcium. METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent both a traditional coronary artery calcium scan on a dedicated cardiac CT scanner (CAC-CT) and a myocardial perfusion scan on a hybrid PET-CT scanner. The standard MPI protocol includes rest and stress-matched PET and CTAC scans. The post-stress CTAC scan was modified to approximate the CAC-CT scan protocol while maintaining ~0.5 mSv dose. Coronary artery calcium scores were compared between the Ca-CTAC and CAC-CT scans. RESULTS: The modified Ca-CTAC scan showed a trend toward slight decreases in segmental stress perfusion of 2-3.5% in the anterior wall segments (P < 0.05). Correlation and agreement between the proposed Ca-CTAC and standard CAC-CT calcium scores at the optimal threshold of 110 HU were also excellent (r (2) = 0.99, κ = 1.0). There was a small difference in the regression slope vs unity: Ca-CTAC = 0.96 × CAC (P < 0.05), but the categorical classification of calcium was accurate in all twenty-three patients (κ = 1.0). CONCLUSION: A single low-dose rest CTAC scan can be used for accurate attenuation correction of rest and stress PET perfusion images, thus allowing a post-stress CTAC scan to be optimized for improved quantification of coronary artery calcium without increasing radiation dose vs standard protocols.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium is an important marker of coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using PET-CT technology requires a CT scan for attenuation correction (CTAC) but is not used routinely to measure coronary calcium burden. This study aimed to determine if a low-dose CTAC scan can also accurately quantify coronary artery calcium. METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent both a traditional coronary artery calcium scan on a dedicated cardiac CT scanner (CAC-CT) and a myocardial perfusion scan on a hybrid PET-CT scanner. The standard MPI protocol includes rest and stress-matched PET and CTAC scans. The post-stress CTAC scan was modified to approximate the CAC-CT scan protocol while maintaining ~0.5 mSv dose. Coronary artery calcium scores were compared between the Ca-CTAC and CAC-CT scans. RESULTS: The modified Ca-CTAC scan showed a trend toward slight decreases in segmental stress perfusion of 2-3.5% in the anterior wall segments (P < 0.05). Correlation and agreement between the proposed Ca-CTAC and standard CAC-CT calcium scores at the optimal threshold of 110 HU were also excellent (r (2) = 0.99, κ = 1.0). There was a small difference in the regression slope vs unity: Ca-CTAC = 0.96 × CAC (P < 0.05), but the categorical classification of calcium was accurate in all twenty-three patients (κ = 1.0). CONCLUSION: A single low-dose rest CTAC scan can be used for accurate attenuation correction of rest and stress PET perfusion images, thus allowing a post-stress CTAC scan to be optimized for improved quantification of coronary artery calcium without increasing radiation dose vs standard protocols.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Todd C Villines; Edward A Hulten; Leslee J Shaw; Manju Goyal; Allison Dunning; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Y Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Augustin Delago; Martin Hadamitzky; Jörg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Benjamin J W Chow; George A Wells; Li Chen; Yeung Yam; Paul Galiwango; Arun Abraham; Tej Sheth; Carole Dennie; Rob S Beanlands; Terrence D Ruddy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Lynne L Johnson; Sabahat Bokhari; Jessica Son; Randall C Thompson; Timothy M Bateman; Sean W Hayes; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ilias Mylonas; Mustapha Kazmi; Lyanne Fuller; Robert A deKemp; Yeung Yam; Li Chen; Rob S Beanlands; Benjamin J W Chow Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Patrick T Siegrist; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David T Harnett; Samir Hazra; Ronnen Maze; Brian A Mc Ardle; Ali Alenazy; Trevor Simard; Ellen Henry; Girish Dwivedi; Christopher Glover; Robert A deKemp; Ross A Davies; Terrence D Ruddy; Benjamin J W Chow; Rob S Beanlands; Benjamin Hibbert Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Magdalena M Dobrolinska; Sergiy V Lazarenko; Friso M van der Zant; Lonneke Does; Niels van der Werf; Niek H J Prakken; Marcel J W Greuter; Riemer H J A Slart; Remco J J Knol Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: S G M van Velzen; M M Dobrolinska; P Knaapen; R L M van Herten; R Jukema; I Danad; R H J A Slart; M J W Greuter; I Išgum Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 3.872