Literature DB >> 23329119

[Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis].

D Uthoff1, K Hebestedt, G I W Duncker, E Spörl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laser in situ keratomileusis is a safe and accepted method for correcting myopia. The operational results in terms of accuracy as well as the subjective acceptance of patients for corrections to - 8 D are now considered to be promising (Seiler, Refraktive Chirurgie der Hornhaut, 2000); however, postoperative results show individual patient problems in long-term stability. It is believed that the preoperative condition of the cornea (e.g. thickness, biomechanical properties) could have an influence on postoperative problems such as myopic regression.
METHOD: This study included a total of 46 eyes from 25 patients. At 3 months postoperatively, 15 patients (19 eyes) showed a SEQ of -0.50 D or more. Within this group, 11 patients (15 eyes) developed a regression (regression group) within the first 3 postoperative months. The remainder of the total group did not show any regression (stability group). The subjects of this study were on average 33 ± 8 years (stability group) and 31 ± 7 years old (regression group). The corneal thickness was tested and refractive error, visual acuity (BCVA/UCVA) and intraocular pressure was measured. In addition, the corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were determined.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.14 D ± 1.41 D (SE) in the stability group and - 6.47 D ± 1.40 D (p = 0.001)in the regression group. Also, the postoperative spherical equivalents were statistically significant different (p < 0.05). In contrast, the mean preoperative corneal thickness showed no differences in both groups (p = 0.96) (stability group 563 ± 36 µm and regression group 563 ± 28 µm).
CONCLUSIONS: The aim of the study to detect a possible causal relationship between myopia regression after LASIK and the biomechanical properties of the cornea and corneal thickness could not be clearly identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329119     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-012-2633-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  27 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Susan K Feigenbaum; Mujtaba A Qazi; Jeffrey P Sanderson; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  Thomas Ho; Arthur C K Cheng; Srinivas K Rao; Silvania Lau; Chris K S Leung; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery.

Authors:  Annette Hager; Kristina Loge; Marc-Oliver Füllhas; Bernd Schroeder; Martin Grossherr; Wolfgang Wiegand
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Dolores Ortiz; David Piñero; Mohamed H Shabayek; Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

Authors:  Mujtaba A Qazi; Jeff P Sanderson; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Eric Y Yoon; Cynthia J Roberts; Jay S Pepose
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Corneal biomechanical properties and their correlates with refractive error.

Authors:  Hema Radhakrishnan; Marco A Miranda; Clare O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefront-guided aberration-free ablation profile: Six-month results.

Authors:  Maria Clara Arbelaez; Camila Vidal; Samuel Arba-Mosquera
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Seven-year follow-up of LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Waldir Neira Zalentein; Timo M T Tervo; Juha M Holopainen
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  [Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes].

Authors:  E Spörl; N Terai; M Haustein; A G Böhm; F Raiskup-Wolf; L E Pillunat
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.