Literature DB >> 2332514

Value of the necropsy in perioperative deaths.

J H Shanks1, G McCluggage, N H Anderson, P G Toner.   

Abstract

A series of 213 perioperative deaths was studied out of a total of 1451 consecutive necropsies carried out over three years. Discrepancies between the clinical and the necropsy diagnosis were assessed under four classes of discrepant diagnosis: class I, patient survival affected, treatable; class II, patient survival affected but not treatable; class III, correlated to cause of death but treatable; and class IV, incidental diagnosis which could not have been made before death. Major discrepancies of classes I and II were found in 44 (21%) and 62 (29%) cases, respectively. Minor discrepancies of classes III and IV were found in 63 (30%) and 101 (47%) cases, respectively. No discrepancies were found in 50 (23.5%) cases. These results confirm the continuing value of the necropsy in the assessment of perioperative deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2332514      PMCID: PMC502327          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.43.3.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  5 in total

1.  Necropsies in clinical audit.

Authors:  N H Anderson; J H Shanks; G W McCluggage; P G Toner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

Authors:  L Goldman; R Sayson; S Robbins; L H Cohn; M Bettmann; M Weisberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan; H Watson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-11

4.  Correlation of clinical diagnoses with autopsy findings: a retrospective study of 2,145 consecutive autopsies.

Authors:  G Stevanovic; G Tucakovic; R Dotlic; V Kanjuh
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses.

Authors:  R M Battle; D Pathak; C G Humble; C R Key; P R Vanatta; R B Hill; R E Anderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Acp. Best practice no 155. Pathological investigation of deaths following surgery, anaesthesia, and medical procedures.

Authors:  R D Start; S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Post mortem examinations after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M F Hickling; D E Pontefract; P J Gallagher; S A Livesey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Does the medical autopsy still have a place in the current diagnostic process? A 6-year retrospective study in two French University hospitals.

Authors:  Sarah Humez; Clémence Delteil; Claude Alain Maurage; Julia Torrents; Caroline Capuani; Lucile Tuchtan; Marie-Dominique Piercecchi
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected.

Authors:  D A Mosquera; M D Goldman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.