Literature DB >> 31707602

Does the medical autopsy still have a place in the current diagnostic process? A 6-year retrospective study in two French University hospitals.

Sarah Humez1, Clémence Delteil2,3,4, Claude Alain Maurage1, Julia Torrents5,6, Caroline Capuani5,7, Lucile Tuchtan5,7, Marie-Dominique Piercecchi5,7.   

Abstract

Medical autopsies have been in considerable decline for several decades, in France and worldwide. We aimed to determine whether a medical autopsy still currently has a role to play in diagnosis, by analyzing its performance and diagnostic limitations. This dual-centre retrospective descriptive study included all medical autopsies performed in the university hospitals of Lille and Marseille, France, between January 2007 and December 2012. Autopsies of fetuses or stillborn infants, or those related to sudden infant deaths and research protocols were excluded. 412 medical autopsies were included. The male:female ratio was 1.5:1 and mean age was 27.3 years. Half of all autopsies were pediatric. Regarding anatomical region and/or injury mechanism, a clinical diagnosis was suggested in 52.2% of cases, an autopsy diagnosis in 55.6% and a microscopic diagnosis in 81.8%. There was very low agreement between the clinician's suggested diagnosis and the final diagnosis, both for organ specific diseases and cause of death. Agreement was moderate between autopsy diagnoses and microscopic diagnoses for organ specific diseases and low for cause of death. From our findings we concluded that an autopsy associated with microscopic examination was still valuable in diagnosing cause of death. Microscopic examination was indispensable to determine certain causes of death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cause of death; Diagnostic procedure; Medical autopsy; Pathology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31707602     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-019-00170-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  27 in total

Review 1.  Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  J Roulson; E W Benbow; P S Hasleton
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Audit of necropsies in a British district general hospital.

Authors:  M D Harris; J W Blundell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The needle in the haystack: Histology of post-mortem computed tomography guided biopsies versus autopsy derived tissue.

Authors:  Bartholomeus G H Latten; Franciscus C H Bakers; Paul A M Hofman; Axel Zur Hausen; Bela Kubat
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Value of the necropsy in perioperative deaths.

Authors:  J H Shanks; G McCluggage; N H Anderson; P G Toner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected.

Authors:  D A Mosquera; M D Goldman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan; H Watson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-11

7.  Necropsy practice after the "organ retention scandal": requests, performance, and tissue retention.

Authors:  J L Burton; J C E Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  [Forensic scientist's implication regarding medical autopsies: experience in a French university hospital (CHU Toulouse)].

Authors:  Caroline Capuani; Céline Guilbeau-Frugier; Fabrice Dedouit; Daniel Rougé; Marie-Bernadette Delisle; Norbert Telmon
Journal:  Ann Pathol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 0.407

9.  The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities.

Authors:  Jan G van den Tweel; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.