Literature DB >> 3793085

Correlation of clinical diagnoses with autopsy findings: a retrospective study of 2,145 consecutive autopsies.

G Stevanovic, G Tucakovic, R Dotlic, V Kanjuh.   

Abstract

The protocols of 2,145 autopsies were retrospectively reviewed and the findings compared with the clinical diagnoses. A sudden decline in the autopsy rate that occurred during the period studied was followed by a highly statistically significant difference in clinical accuracy (P less than 0.01), in favor of the predecline period. The overall rate of major discrepancies was 29 per cent. The most frequently missed diagnoses were infections, which were found in 26 per cent of all autopsies and had not been diagnosed clinically in 63 per cent of these cases. Malignancies occupied second place among overlooked diagnoses in the selected disease categories; in 99 per cent of the cases the malignancy was the principal diagnosis, and it had been misdiagnosed clinically in 42 per cent of these cases. Cerebrovascular disorders were correctly diagnosed in most cases (87 per cent of the patients in this group). Among autopsy diagnoses labeled as the immediate causes of death, the most frequently overlooked were pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which were not recognized in 84 and 78 per cent, respectively. In cases in which clinicians were not entirely confident in their impressions, their diagnoses were usually confirmed at autopsy. In these cases 15 per cent of the patients died soon after admission to the hospital, with accurate diagnoses in 71 per cent. The discrepancies disclosed should be regarded as sufficiently large to mandate continued emphasis on autopsy evaluation as the basis for the control of the quality of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3793085     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(86)80564-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  24 in total

1.  Is autopsy dead in the ICU?

Authors:  A Esteban; P Fernández-Segoviano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Declining necropsy rate.

Authors:  A P Giles; R Doshi; G G Menon; M K Khan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Declining necropsy rate.

Authors:  A P Giles; R Doshi; G G Menon; M K Khan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The value of autopsies in neurosurgery.

Authors:  A Jamjoom; T Moss; Z A Jamjoom; G Stranjalis; G Stanjalis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Quality assurance programme for necropsies.

Authors:  M Harrison; D O Hourihane
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Value of the necropsy in perioperative deaths.

Authors:  J H Shanks; G McCluggage; N H Anderson; P G Toner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a "view and grant" system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales.

Authors:  G N Rutty; R M Duerden; N Carter; J C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; S E Shirley; C T Escoffery; M Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Fabiana Kotovicz; Thais Mauad; Paulo H N Saldiva
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.