Literature DB >> 23321621

Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process.

Carmen Ayuso1, José M Millán, Marta Mancheño, Rafael Dal-Ré.   

Abstract

The development of new massive sequencing techniques has now made it possible to significantly reduce the time and costs of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Although WGS will soon become a routine testing tool, new ethical issues have surfaced. In light of these concerns, a systematic review of papers published by expert authors on IC or specific ethical issues related to IC for WGS analysis in the clinical setting has been conducted using the Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Additionally, a search was conducted for international ethical guidelines for genetic studies published by scientific societies and ethical boards. Based on these documents, a minimum set of information to be provided to patients in the IC form was determined. Fourteen and seven documents from the database search and from scientific societies, respectively, were selected. A very high level of consistency between them was found regarding the recommended IC form content. Pre-test counselling and general information common to all genetic tests should be included in the IC form for WGS for diagnostic purposes, but additional information addressing specific issues on WGS are proposed, such as a plan for the ethical, clinically oriented return of incidental findings. Moreover, storage of additional information for future use should also be agreed upon with the patient in advance. Recommendations for WGS studies in the clinical setting concerning both the elements of information and the process of obtaining the IC as well as how to handle the results obtained are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23321621      PMCID: PMC3778336          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  22 in total

1.  Whole-genome sequencing and the physician.

Authors:  A Thorogood; B M Knoppers; W J Dondorp; G M W R de Wert
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Matthew T Wheeler; Louanne Hudgins; Teri E Klein; Atul J Butte; Russ B Altman; Euan A Ashley; Henry T Greely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Whole genome scanning: resolving clinical diagnosis and management amidst complex data.

Authors:  Sarah E Ali-Khan; Abdallah S Daar; Cheryl Shuman; Peter N Ray; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Next generation sequencing--implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Eleanor Raffan; Robert K Semple
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  The changing landscape of genetic testing and its impact on clinical and laboratory services and research in Europe.

Authors:  Ros Hastings; Guido de Wert; Brian Fowler; Michael Krawczak; Eric Vermeulen; Egbert Bakker; Pascal Borry; Wybo Dondorp; Niels Nijsingh; David Barton; Jörg Schmidtke; Carla G van El; Joris Vermeesch; Yrrah Stol; Heidi Carmen Howard; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Use of whole-genome sequencing to diagnose a cryptic fusion oncogene.

Authors:  John S Welch; Peter Westervelt; Li Ding; David E Larson; Jeffery M Klco; Shashikant Kulkarni; John Wallis; Ken Chen; Jacqueline E Payton; Robert S Fulton; Joelle Veizer; Heather Schmidt; Tammi L Vickery; Sharon Heath; Mark A Watson; Michael H Tomasson; Daniel C Link; Timothy A Graubert; John F DiPersio; Elaine R Mardis; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Ensuring the safe use of genomic medicine in children.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Sharon F Terry
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 1.168

8.  Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Gerard T Berry; Leslie G Biesecker; David P Dimmock; James P Evans; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri R Hegde; Sarah Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Ian Krantz; Amy L McGuire; David T Miller; Michael F Murray; Robert L Nussbaum; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; Howard J Jacob
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The role of disease characteristics in the ethical debate on personal genome testing.

Authors:  Eline M Bunnik; Maartje Hn Schermer; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Is gene discovery research or diagnosis?

Authors:  Mark E Samuels; Andrew Orr; Duane L Guernsey; Kent Dooley; Christie Riddell; Kathy Hodgkinson; Mark Ludman; Daryl Pullman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  My Identical Twin Sequenced our Genome.

Authors:  Samantha L P Schilit; Arielle Schilit Nitenson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Emilia Niemiec; Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Reply to Townsend et al.

Authors:  Carmen Ayuso; José M Millán; Marta Mancheño; Rafael Dal-Ré
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Autonomy and the patient's right 'not to know' in clinical whole-genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Francois Rousseau; Jan Friedman; Shelin Adam; Zoe Lohn; Patricia Birch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Susan M Wolf; Kristine J Kuczynski; Steven Joffe; Richard R Sharp; D Williams Parsons; Bartha M Knoppers; Joon-Ho Yu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Rapid Challenges: Ethics and Genomic Neonatal Intensive Care.

Authors:  Christopher Gyngell; Ainsley J Newson; Dominic Wilkinson; Zornitza Stark; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Ashley N Tomlinson; Debra Skinner; Denise L Perry; Sarah R Scollon; Myra I Roche; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Erisa Mwaka; Lyn Horn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Andrea D Forman; Susan V Montgomery; Kim L Rainey; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.