| Literature DB >> 25264092 |
Gail E Henderson1, Susan M Wolf, Kristine J Kuczynski, Steven Joffe, Richard R Sharp, D Williams Parsons, Bartha M Knoppers, Joon-Ho Yu, Paul S Appelbaum.
Abstract
As exome and genome sequencing move into clinical application, questions surround how to elicit consent and handle potential return of individual genomic results. This study analyzes nine consent forms used in NIH-funded sequencing studies. Content analysis reveals considerable heterogeneity, including in defining results that may be returned, identifying potential benefits and risks of return, protecting privacy, addressing placement of results in the medical record, and data-sharing. In response to lack of consensus, we offer recommendations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25264092 PMCID: PMC4262925 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Law Med Ethics ISSN: 1073-1105 Impact factor: 1.718