Literature DB >> 23312961

Small breast lesion classification performance using the normalized axial-shear strain area feature.

Arun K Thittai1, Jose-Miguel Yamal, Jonathan Ophir.   

Abstract

Breast cancers that are found and confirmed because they are causing symptoms tend to be larger and are more likely to have already spread to the lymph nodes and beyond. Thus, early detection and confirmation are of paramount importance. The normalized axial-shear strain area (NASSA) feature from the axial-shear strain elastogram (ASSE) has been shown to be a feature that can identify the boundary-bonding conditions that are indicative of the presence of cancer. Recently, we investigated and reported on the potential of the NASSA feature for breast lesion classification into fibroadenomas and cancers. In this article, we investigate the size distribution of the lesions that were part of the previous study and analyze classification performance specifically on small lesions (<10 mm diameter). A total of 33 biopsy-proven malignant tumors and 30 fibroadenomas were part of the study that involved three observers blinded to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) ultrasound scores. The observers outlined the lesions on the sonograms and the lesion size (maximum circle-equivalent diameter in millimeters) was computed from this outline. The ASSE was automatically segmented and color-overlaid on the sonogram, and the NASSA feature from ASSE was computed semi-automatically. Receiver operating characteristic curves were then generated for the subset of cases involving small lesions. Box plots were produced for the two different lesion size groups, small and large, from a logistic regression classifier that was built previously. The results of our study show that approximately 38% and 22% of the fibroadenomas and cancers, respectively, were small. Furthermore, it was found that the NASSA feature resulted in a perfect classification of the small lesions, both in the training data and in the cross-validation. For lesions <10 mm the difference in fibroadenoma and cancer mean scores was 0.73 ± 0.13 (p < 0.001), whereas lesions >10 mm had a difference of 0.52 ± 0.24 (p < 0.001). The results also showed that the small lesions actually had better classification than the larger lesions (>10 mm). These results suggest that the ASSE feature can work equally well, even on small lesions, to improve the standard ultrasound BIRADS-based breast lesion classification of fibroadenoma and malignant tumors.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23312961      PMCID: PMC3587118          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  22 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Multiresolution imaging in elastography.

Authors:  T Varghese; M Bilgen; J Ophir
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo.

Authors:  I Céspedes; J Ophir; H Ponnekanti; N Maklad
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography.

Authors:  Kellie L Mathis; Tanya L Hoskin; Judy C Boughey; Brian S Crownhart; Kathy R Brandt; Celine M Vachon; Clive S Grant; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P P Rosen; S Groshen; D W Kinne; L Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P Valagussa; G Bonadonna; U Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Rongmin Xia
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Enhancing Performance of Breast Ultrasound in Opportunistic Screening Women by a Deep Learning-Based System: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Chenyang Zhao; Mengsu Xiao; Li Ma; Xinhua Ye; Jing Deng; Ligang Cui; Fajin Guo; Min Wu; Baoming Luo; Qin Chen; Wu Chen; Jun Guo; Qian Li; Qing Zhang; Jianchu Li; Yuxin Jiang; Qingli Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Automated Classification of Benign and Malignant Proliferative Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Evani Radiya-Dixit; David Zhu; Andrew H Beck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.