Literature DB >> 23298093

A digitally reconstructed radiograph algorithm calculated from first principles.

David Staub1, Martin J Murphy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an algorithm for computing realistic digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) that match real cone-beam CT (CBCT) projections with no artificial adjustments.
METHODS: The authors used measured attenuation data from cone-beam CT projection radiographs of different materials to obtain a function to convert CT number to linear attenuation coefficient (LAC). The effects of scatter, beam hardening, and veiling glare were first removed from the attenuation data. Using this conversion function the authors calculated the line integral of LAC through a CT along rays connecting the radiation source and detector pixels with a ray-tracing algorithm, producing raw DRRs. The effects of scatter, beam hardening, and veiling glare were then included in the DRRs through postprocessing.
RESULTS: The authors compared actual CBCT projections to DRRs produced with all corrections (scatter, beam hardening, and veiling glare) and to uncorrected DRRs. Algorithm accuracy was assessed through visual comparison of projections and DRRs, pixel intensity comparisons, intensity histogram comparisons, and correlation plots of DRR-to-projection pixel intensities. In general, the fully corrected algorithm provided a small but nontrivial improvement in accuracy over the uncorrected algorithm. The authors also investigated both measurement- and computation-based methods for determining the beam hardening correction, and found the computation-based method to be superior, as it accounted for nonuniform bowtie filter thickness. The authors benchmarked the algorithm for speed and found that it produced DRRs in about 0.35 s for full detector and CT resolution at a ray step-size of 0.5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated a DRR algorithm calculated from first principles that accounts for scatter, beam hardening, and veiling glare in order to produce accurate DRRs. The algorithm is computationally efficient, making it a good candidate for iterative CT reconstruction techniques that require a data fidelity term based on the matching of DRRs and projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298093      PMCID: PMC3532107          DOI: 10.1118/1.4769413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Reconstruction algorithm for polychromatic CT imaging: application to beam hardening correction.

Authors:  C H Yan; R T Whalen; G S Beaupré; S Y Yen; S Napel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; G P Liney; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  4D Cone-beam CT reconstruction using a motion model based on principal component analysis.

Authors:  David Staub; Alen Docef; Robert S Brock; Constantin Vaman; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Assessing the intrinsic precision of 3D/3D rigid image registration results for patient setup in the absence of a ground truth.

Authors:  Jian Wu; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Monte Carlo evaluation of scatter mitigation strategies in cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dimitrios Lazos; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Raymond Acciavatti; Johnny Kuo; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Fast DRR generation for 2D to 3D registration on GPUs.

Authors:  Gábor János Tornai; György Cserey; Ion Pappas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  A general framework and review of scatter correction methods in x-ray cone-beam computerized tomography. Part 1: Scatter compensation approaches.

Authors:  Ernst-Peter Rührnschopf; Klaus Klingenbeck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reconstruction of a cone-beam CT image via forward iterative projection matching.

Authors:  R Scott Brock; Alen Docef; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Removal and effects of scatter-glare in cone-beam CT with an amorphous-silicon flat-panel detector.

Authors:  G Poludniowski; P M Evans; A Kavanagh; S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of errors in measurements of infantile hip radiograph using digitally reconstructed radiograph from three-dimensional MRI.

Authors:  Daisuke Hamano; Kiyoshi Yoshida; Chikahisa Higuchi; Dai Otsuki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-09

2.  Anatomy-Aware Inference of the 3D Standing Spine Posture from 2D Radiographs.

Authors:  Amirhossein Bayat; Danielle F Pace; Anjany Sekuboyina; Christian Payer; Darko Stern; Martin Urschler; Jan S Kirschke; Bjoern H Menze
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Automatic landmark detection and mapping for 2D/3D registration with BoneNet.

Authors:  Van Nguyen; Luis F Alves Pereira; Zhihua Liang; Falk Mielke; Jeroen Van Houtte; Jan Sijbers; Jan De Beenhouwer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 4.  Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density?

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-05-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.