Literature DB >> 23282029

In vitro evaluation of ScopeSafe fibers and the scope guardian sheath in prevention of ureteroscope endolumenal working damage.

Achim Lusch1, Corollos Abdelshehid, Michael A Liss, Reza Alipanah, Elspeth M McDougall, Jaime Landman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ureteroscope breakage is commonly related to laser fiber damage. Often, the damage is mechanical and not energy related. As such, we evaluated a novel laser fiber and sheath system in preventing mechanical ureteroscope damage during fiber insertion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 200-μm/272/3-μm laser fibers with the laser sheath in a flexible ureteroscope. Diminishment of active deflection and irrigation flow rates were compared with a standard laser fiber alone. Eight nonassembled working channel components were tested in a 0-degree/90-degree/210-degree deflection model. After insertion cycles, external and endolumenal damage to the working channel were classified. We also tested the sheath system in a 0-degree/90-degree/210-degree deflection model for fiber failure and laser damage.
RESULTS: In all test trials with the sheath and for standard laser fibers in the 0-degree model, there were no channel perforations or damage. With standard laser fibers, in the 210-degree model, superficial scratches and demarcated abrasions were visible after 10 and 60 to 70 insertions for the 273-μm laser fiber and after 30 insertions (superficial scratches) for the 200-μm laser fiber. In the 90-degree model, superficial scratches occurred after 20 insertions for the 273-μm fibers and after 40 insertions for the 200-μm laser fibers. No demarcated abrasions were seen after 100 insertions. In the 210-degree model, there was one perforation with the 272-μm fiber, but none with 200-μm fiber. There were no fiber failures with sheath use; however, the sheath did not prevent laser energy damage. The laser sheath resulted in a 4.7-degree/3.8-degree (1.2%/1.5%) diminishment in deflection (up/down) for the 200 μm and a 3.5-degree/4.3-degree (1.8%/1.5%) diminishment for 272-μm laser fiber compared with standard 200/272-μm laser fiber. Irrigation flow was diminished with the sheath on both the 200-μm and 272-μm laser fiber by 28.7% and 32.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The Scope Guardian Sheath prevented mechanical working channel damage with minimal diminishment of deflection and irrigation flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23282029      PMCID: PMC3903164          DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  Use of a working channel catheter during flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  B K Hollenbeck; S L Spencer; G J Faerber
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.

Authors:  J S Afane; E O Olweny; E Bercowsky; C P Sundaram; M D Dunn; A L Shalhav; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Flexible ureteroscopes: a user's guide.

Authors:  J Parkin; F X Keeley; A G Timoney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Jaime Landman; David I Lee; Courtney Lee; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.

Authors:  Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael T Ahlering; David Chou; Hyung Keun Park; Jay Basillote; David Lee; Isaac Kim; Louis Eichel; Dmitriy Protsenko; Brian Wong; Elspeth McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Durability of working channel in flexible ureteroscopes when inserting ureteroscopic devices.

Authors:  Chikashi Seto; Yoshiyuki Ishiura; Masayuki Egawa; Kazuto Komatsu; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Evaluation of a protective laser sheath for application in flexible ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Evren Durak; Greg Hruby; Rob Mitchell; Franzo Marruffo; Jorge O Abundez; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Does the cleaning technique influence the durability of the <9F flexible ureteroscope?

Authors:  E M McDougall; G Alberts; K J Deal; J M Nagy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity.

Authors:  Paul K Pietrow; Brian K Auge; Fernando C Delvecchio; Ari D Silverstein; Alon Z Weizer; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of laser fiber passage in ureteroscopic maximum deflection and their influence on deflection and irrigation: Do we really need the ball tip concept?

Authors:  Mohammed Baghdadi; Esteban Emiliani; Michele Talso; Pol Servián; Aaron Barreiro; Andrea Orosa; Silvia Proietti; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.