Literature DB >> 16548735

Durability of working channel in flexible ureteroscopes when inserting ureteroscopic devices.

Chikashi Seto1, Yoshiyuki Ishiura, Masayuki Egawa, Kazuto Komatsu, Mikio Namiki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the physical damage to the working channel of flexible ureteroscopes caused by insertion of various accessories. A procedure was developed to avoid channel damage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental model representing a flexible ureteroscope was prepared, and damage to its working channel was evaluated by inserting instruments through it. Deflection angles of the channel were changed from 0 degrees to 120 degrees, and each device was inserted and removed 100 times for each selected angle of the channel. Any induced pinholes were identified by an air-leak test. Also, the inside of the channel was inspected with an extremely fine fiberscope.
RESULTS: Insertions of 3F biopsy forceps or a 2.4F Nitinol stone-retrieval device caused only slight damage to the model channel, even when the deflection angle was 120 degrees. However, the tips of 200- or 250-microm holmium laser fibers shaved the inner surface of the channel at 60 degrees of deflection, and at 120 degrees, the laser fiber either penetrated the channel or could not be advanced because of resistance by the channel wall. When the laser fiber was inserted within a protective tube, the channel was never damaged, even when the deflection angle was 120 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: When devices are inserted into the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope, damage to the wall depends on the kind of device and deflection angle. Harm could be avoided by inserting the devices, especially laser probes, within a protective tube.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16548735     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of ScopeSafe fibers and the scope guardian sheath in prevention of ureteroscope endolumenal working damage.

Authors:  Achim Lusch; Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael A Liss; Reza Alipanah; Elspeth M McDougall; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.

Authors:  Khaled Hosny; Jennifer Clark; Shalom J Srirangam
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  The effect of laser fiber on the damage of the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope.

Authors:  Kantima Jongjitaree; Chaiyan Subpayakorn; Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap; Sunai Leewansangtong; Sittiporn Srinualnad; Ekkarin Chotikawanich
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-11-27

5.  FlexGuard: a new laser insertion sheath: functional aspects in ureterorenoscopy (URS).

Authors:  T R W Herrmann; T Bach; F Imkamp; H Tezval; C Klot; U Jonas; A J Gross; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  The new Olympus digital flexible ureteroscope (URF-V): Initial experience.

Authors:  Saeed M Al-Qahtani; Bogdan Geavlete; Bogdan P Geavlette; Sixtina Gil-Diez de Medina; Olivier P Traxer
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2011-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.