Literature DB >> 15879808

Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.

Corollos Abdelshehid1, Michael T Ahlering, David Chou, Hyung Keun Park, Jay Basillote, David Lee, Isaac Kim, Louis Eichel, Dmitriy Protsenko, Brian Wong, Elspeth McDougall, Ralph V Clayman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We measured and compared the deflection, irrigation flow rates, distortion, resolution and light transmission of new generation flexible ureteroscopes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple characteristics of 5 flexible ureteroscopes (ACMI DUR-8 Elite, Olympus URF-P3, Storz 11278AU1 [Flex-X], Wolf 7330.072 and Wolf 7325.172) commonly available in the market were measured and compared. Measured data included active deflection, irrigation flow rates and optical characteristics. Each ureteroscope was evaluated with an empty working channel and with various accessories. Optical characteristics, specifically resolution and distortion, were measured using test targets (Edmund Optics, Barrington, New Jersey). Light transmission was also measured from the ureteroscope tip at 50% and 100% intensity. All 5 flexible ureteroscopes were tested in a laboratory setting using a Storz OR 1 system to capture the images.
RESULTS: For all 5 ureteroscopes the angle of deflection was most impaired by a 365 microm laser fiber probe and least impaired by a 2.2Fr nitinol basket. Among all 5 ureteroscopes irrigation flow rate was most impaired with a 3.0Fr basket and least impaired with 200 microm laser fiber. The Wolf 7325.172 had the highest observed resolution of 25.39 lines per mm and the Wolf 7330.072 had the lowest distortion at 11.9%. The Karl Storz Flex-X and the ACMI DUR-8 Elite had the highest light output at 374 and 364 mV, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The various flexible ureteroscopes differ with regard to flow rates as well as degree of deflection with either an empty or an occupied working channel. The Wolf flexible ureteroscope with a slightly larger working channel and a fused quartz bundle provided for superior flow and better optical performance. However, the greatest amount of tip deflection and highest light output were found in the ACMI and Karl Storz flexible ureteroscopes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879808     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158139.65771.0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Modern urinary stone therapy: is the era of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at an end?].

Authors:  A Miernik; K Wilhelm; P Ardelt; S Bulla; M Schoenthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Updates in endourology.

Authors:  Victor Palit; Adrian D Joyce
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Georgios Gakis; Ute Walcher; Joerg Hennenlotter; Axel S Merseburger; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-03-26

Review 4.  Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Steeve Doizi; Luca Villa; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Jens Bedke; Ulf Leichtle; Andrea Lorenz; Udo Nagele; Arnulf Stenzl; Stephan Kruck
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope.

Authors:  Achim Lusch; Corollos Abdelshehid; Guy Hidas; Kathryn E Osann; Zhamshid Okhunov; Elspeth McDougall; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  In vitro evaluation of ScopeSafe fibers and the scope guardian sheath in prevention of ureteroscope endolumenal working damage.

Authors:  Achim Lusch; Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael A Liss; Reza Alipanah; Elspeth M McDougall; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  An algorithm for calculi segmentation on ureteroscopic images.

Authors:  Benoît Rosa; Pierre Mozer; Jérôme Szewczyk
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Update on ureteroscopy instrumentation.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

10.  Accessory instrumentation in flexible ureteroscopy: Evidence-based recommendation.

Authors:  Timothy Holden; Renato Nardi Pedro; Monoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.