Literature DB >> 10992358

Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.

J S Afane1, E O Olweny, E Bercowsky, C P Sundaram, M D Dunn, A L Shalhav, E M McDougall, R V Clayman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Flexible ureteroscopes smaller than 9Fr are widely used in endourology. We systematically evaluated the functional durability of these instruments in the clinical setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed ureteronephroscopy 92 consecutive times in 84 patients at our hospital using a flexible Storz model 11274AA,double dagger Circon-ACMI model AUR-7, section sign Wolf model 7325.172 parallel and Olympus model URF/P3 ureteroscope paragraph sign. Preoperatively and postoperatively we evaluated all flexible ureteroscopes for luminosity, irrigant flow at 100 mm. Hg, number of broken image fibers and active deflection range. During the procedure a record was kept of the duration that the endoscope remained in the urinary tract, average irrigation pressure, method of insertion, various devices used within the working channel, need for lower pole access, and surgeon overall impression of visibility and maneuverability.
RESULTS: The luminosity and irrigant flow of all endoscopes remained relatively unchanged during consecutive applications, while active deflection deteriorated 2% to 28%. Endoscopes were used for an average of 3 to 13 hours before they needed repair. The most fragile part of these instruments was the deflection unit.
CONCLUSIONS: Small diameter flexible ureteroscopes are effective for diagnosing and treating upper urinary tract pathology but improved durability is required. Currently they represent a highly effective but high maintenance means of achieving retrograde access to the ureter and kidney with a need for repair after only 6 to 15 uses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10992358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  30 in total

1.  Modular flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi: A single-surgeon experience of 382 cases.

Authors:  Zejun Yan; Guohai Xie; Hesheng Yuan; Yue Cheng
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Vishwajeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Rahul Janak Sinha; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  [Technical innovations in endourological stone therapy].

Authors:  P Honeck; U Nagele; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.

Authors:  Susanne Deininger; Luis Haberstock; Stephan Kruck; Eva Neumann; Ines Anselmo da Costa; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Steffen Rausch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  In vitro evaluation of ScopeSafe fibers and the scope guardian sheath in prevention of ureteroscope endolumenal working damage.

Authors:  Achim Lusch; Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael A Liss; Reza Alipanah; Elspeth M McDougall; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: technologic advancements.

Authors:  B Alexander; A I Fishman; M Grasso
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors?

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Tuna Mut; Patrick Krombach; Maurice Stephan Michel; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-05

Review 8.  Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Alvaro Jiménez Godínez; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25

9.  Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.

Authors:  Dylan Isaacson; Tessnim Ahmad; Ian Metzler; David T Tzou; Kazumi Taguchi; Manint Usawachintachit; Samuel Zetumer; Benjamin Sherer; Marshall Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Flexible ureteroscopy update: indications, instrumentation and technical advances.

Authors:  Srinivas Rajamahanty; Michael Grasso
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.