Literature DB >> 23280479

Extracting knowledge from protein structure geometry.

Peter Røgen1, Patrice Koehl.   

Abstract

Protein structure prediction techniques proceed in two steps, namely the generation of many structural models for the protein of interest, followed by an evaluation of all these models to identify those that are native-like. In theory, the second step is easy, as native structures correspond to minima of their free energy surfaces. It is well known however that the situation is more complicated as the current force fields used for molecular simulations fail to recognize native states from misfolded structures. In an attempt to solve this problem, we follow an alternate approach and derive a new potential from geometric knowledge extracted from native and misfolded conformers of protein structures. This new potential, Metric Protein Potential (MPP), has two main features that are key to its success. Firstly, it is composite in that it includes local and nonlocal geometric information on proteins. At the short range level, it captures and quantifies the mapping between the sequences and structures of short (7-mer) fragments of protein backbones through the introduction of a new local energy term. The local energy term is then augmented with a nonlocal residue-based pairwise potential, and a solvent potential. Secondly, it is optimized to yield a maximized correlation between the energy of a structural model and its root mean square (RMS) to the native structure of the corresponding protein. We have shown that MPP yields high correlation values between RMS and energy and that it is able to retrieve the native structure of a protein from a set of high-resolution decoys.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23280479      PMCID: PMC3618491          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  42 in total

1.  Predicting conformational switches in proteins.

Authors:  M Young; K Kirshenbaum; K A Dill; S Highsmith
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

3.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-05-15

5.  Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: the importance of dispersion and volume terms.

Authors:  Jason A Wagoner; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Silvio C E Tosatto; Dietmar Schomburg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-04

7.  Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials.

Authors:  E Furuichi; P Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-05-01

8.  Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct?

Authors:  J Skolnick; L Jaroszewski; A Kolinski; A Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they?

Authors:  P D Thomas; K A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-03-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  On the importance of the distance measures used to train and test knowledge-based potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Martin Carlsen; Patrice Koehl; Peter Røgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.