Literature DB >> 16456861

TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.

Seung Yup Lee1, Yang Zhang, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

The TASSER structure prediction algorithm is employed to investigate whether NMR structures can be moved closer to their corresponding X-ray counterparts by automatic refinement procedures. The benchmark protein dataset includes 61 nonhomologous proteins whose structures have been determined by both NMR and X-ray experiments. Interestingly, by starting from NMR structures, the majority (79%) of TASSER refined models show a structural shift toward their X-ray structures. On average, the TASSER refined models have a root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) from the X-ray structure of 1.785 A (1.556 A) over the entire chain (aligned region), while the average RMSD between NMR and X-ray structures (RMSD(NMR_X-ray)) is 2.080 A (1.731 A). For all proteins having a RMSD(NMR_X-ray) >2 A, the TASSER refined structures show consistent improvement. However, for the 34 proteins with a RMSD(NMR_X-ray) <2 A, there are only 21 cases (60%) where the TASSER model is closer to the X-ray structure than NMR, which may be due to the inherent resolution of TASSER. We also compare the TASSER models with 12 NMR models in the RECOORD database that have been recalculated recently by Nederveen et al. from original NMR restraints using the newest molecular dynamics tools. In 8 of 12 cases, TASSER models show a smaller RMSD to X-ray structures; in 3 of 12 cases, where RMSD(NMR_X-ray) <1 A, RECOORD does better than TASSER. These results suggest that TASSER can be a useful tool to improve the quality of NMR structures. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16456861     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  7 in total

1.  TASSER_WT: a protein structure prediction algorithm with accurate predicted contact restraints for difficult protein targets.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Extracting knowledge from protein structure geometry.

Authors:  Peter Røgen; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-02-27

4.  Refining homology models by combining replica-exchange molecular dynamics and statistical potentials.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Hao Fan; Xavier Periole; Barry Honig; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-09

5.  Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures.

Authors:  Binchen Mao; Roberto Tejero; David Baker; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: a molecular replacement study.

Authors:  Theresa A Ramelot; Srivatsan Raman; Alexandre P Kuzin; Rong Xiao; Li-Chung Ma; Thomas B Acton; John F Hunt; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker; Michael A Kennedy
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-04

7.  BioMagResBank.

Authors:  Eldon L Ulrich; Hideo Akutsu; Jurgen F Doreleijers; Yoko Harano; Yannis E Ioannidis; Jundong Lin; Miron Livny; Steve Mading; Dimitri Maziuk; Zachary Miller; Eiichi Nakatani; Christopher F Schulte; David E Tolmie; R Kent Wenger; Hongyang Yao; John L Markley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.