Literature DB >> 9070450

Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct?

J Skolnick1, L Jaroszewski, A Kolinski, A Godzik.   

Abstract

Many existing derivations of knowledge-based statistical pair potentials invoke the quasichemical approximation to estimate the expected side-chain contact frequency if there were no amino acid pair-specific interactions. At first glance, the quasichemical approximation that treats the residues in a protein as being disconnected and expresses the side-chain contact probability as being proportional to the product of the mole fractions of the pair of residues would appear to be rather severe. To investigate the validity of this approximation, we introduce two new reference states in which no specific pair interactions between amino acids are allowed, but in which the connectivity of the protein chain is retained. The first estimates the expected number of side-chain contracts by treating the protein as a Gaussian random coil polymer. The second, more realistic reference state includes the effects of chain connectivity, secondary structure, and chain compactness by estimating the expected side-chain contrast probability by placing the sequence of interest in each member of a library of structures of comparable compactness to the native conformation. The side-chain contact maps are not allowed to readjust to the sequence of interest, i.e., the side chains cannot repack. This situation would hold rigorously if all amino acids were the same size. Both reference states effectively permit the factorization of the side-chain contact probability into sequence-dependent and structure-dependent terms. Then, because the sequence distribution of amino acids in proteins is random, the quasichemical approximation to each of these reference states is shown to be excellent. Thus, the range of validity of the quasichemical approximation is determined by the magnitude of the side-chain repacking term, which is, at present, unknown. Finally, the performance of these two sets of pair interaction potentials as well as side-chain contact fraction-based interaction scales is assessed by inverse folding tests both without and with allowing for gaps.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9070450      PMCID: PMC2143667          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  15 in total

1.  Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins.

Authors:  V N Maiorov; G M Crippen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem.

Authors:  A Godzik; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins.

Authors:  S Tanaka; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.985

4.  The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential: a statistical model for nonbonded interactions.

Authors:  S H Bryant; C E Lawrence
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1991

5.  Response: how much solar radiation do clouds absorb?

Authors:  K J Lumb; P S Kim
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Folding simulations and computer redesign of protein A three-helix bundle motifs.

Authors:  K A Olszewski; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-07

Review 7.  Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations.

Authors:  R L Jernigan; I Bahar
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  On the origin of the cooperativity of protein folding: implications from model simulations.

Authors:  A Kolinski; W Galazka; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-11

9.  Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics?

Authors:  A V Finkelstein; A M Gutin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-10

10.  Reduced representation model of protein structure prediction: statistical potential and genetic algorithms.

Authors:  S Sun
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  68 in total

1.  Streptavidin tetramerization and 2D crystallization: a mean-field approach.

Authors:  T Coussaert; A R Völkel; J Noolandi; A P Gast
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins.

Authors:  C Zhang; S H Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A statistical mechanical method to optimize energy functions for protein folding.

Authors:  U Bastolla; M Vendruscolo; E W Knapp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Scoring functions in protein folding and design.

Authors:  R I Dima; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Native topology determines force-induced unfolding pathways in globular proteins.

Authors:  D K Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Measures of residue density in protein structures.

Authors:  F Baud; S Karlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure-based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: application to a broad range of MHC alleles.

Authors:  O Schueler-Furman; Y Altuvia; A Sette; H Margalit
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Fold prediction of helical proteins using torsion angle dynamics and predicted restraints.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Jingtong Hou; Sung-Hou Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Can correct protein models be identified?

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.