Literature DB >> 15836022

Alchemical free energy calculations and multiple conformational substates.

Martin Leitgeb1, Christian Schröder, Stefan Boresch.   

Abstract

Thermodynamic integration (TI) was combined with (adaptive) umbrella sampling to improve the convergence of alchemical free energy simulations in which multiple conformational substates are present. The approach, which we refer to as non-Boltzmann TI (NBTI), was tested by computing the free energy differences between three five-atomic model systems, as well as the free energy difference of solvation between leucine and asparagine. In both cases regular TI failed to give converged results, whereas the NBTI results were free from hysteresis and had standard deviations well below +/-0.7 kcal/mole. We also present theoretical considerations that make it possible to compute free energy differences between simple molecules, such as the five-atomic model systems, by numerical integration of the partition functions at the respective end points.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15836022     DOI: 10.1063/1.1850900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  13 in total

1.  Let's get honest about sampling.

Authors:  David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Application of a polarizable force field to calculations of relative protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Oleg Khoruzhii; Alexander G Donchev; Nikolay Galkin; Alexei Illarionov; Mikhail Olevanov; Vladimir Ozrin; Cary Queen; Vladimir Tarasov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Confine-and-Release Method: Obtaining Correct Binding Free Energies in the Presence of Protein Conformational Change.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Enhanced Sampling in Free Energy Calculations: Combining SGLD with the Bennett's Acceptance Ratio and Enveloping Distribution Sampling Methods.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Benjamin T Miller; Stefan Boresch; Xiongwu Wu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Computational study of synthetic agonist ligands of ionotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Tino Wolter; Thomas Steinbrecher; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.