Literature DB >> 23464180

Separated topologies--a method for relative binding free energy calculations using orientational restraints.

Gabriel J Rocklin1, David L Mobley, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

Orientational restraints can improve the efficiency of alchemical free energy calculations, but they are not typically applied in relative binding calculations, which compute the affinity difference been two ligands. Here, we describe a new "separated topologies" method, which computes relative binding free energies using orientational restraints and which has several advantages over existing methods. While standard approaches maintain the initial and final ligand in a shared orientation, the separated topologies approach allows the initial and final ligands to have distinct orientations. This avoids a slowly converging reorientation step in the calculation. The separated topologies approach can also be applied to determine the relative free energies of multiple orientations of the same ligand. We illustrate the approach by calculating the relative binding free energies of two compounds to an engineered site in Cytochrome C Peroxidase.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23464180      PMCID: PMC3598757          DOI: 10.1063/1.4792251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  27 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 2.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Protein-Ligand Complexes:  Computation of the Relative Free Energy of Different Scaffolds and Binding Modes.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Marcel L Verdonk; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Comparison of efficiency and bias of free energies computed by exponential averaging, the Bennett acceptance ratio, and thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

8.  Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Elise Dumont; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Molecular dynamics studies on peroxidases: a structural model for horseradish peroxidase and a substrate adduct.

Authors:  L Banci; P Carloni; G G Savellini
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-10-18       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  10 in total

1.  Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations?

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Lingle Wang; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Jeffry Setiadi; Yunhui Ge; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.179

4.  RestraintMaker: a graph-based approach to select distance restraints in free-energy calculations with dual topology.

Authors:  Benjamin Ries; Salomé Rieder; Clemens Rhiner; Philippe H Hünenberger; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.179

5.  Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; Sarah E Boyce; Marcus Fischer; Inbar Fish; David L Mobley; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Uncovering Molecular Bases Underlying Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Inhibitor Selectivity.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Alsamarah; Alecander E LaCuran; Peter Oelschlaeger; Jijun Hao; Yun Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Joseph W Kaus; Edward Harder; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; J Andrew McCammon; Lingle Wang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  On the accuracy of one- and two-particle solvation entropies.

Authors:  Benedict W J Irwin; David J Huggins
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Automation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy calculations for docking refinement and compound evaluation.

Authors:  Germano Heinzelmann; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dummy Atoms in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Markus Fleck; Marcus Wieder; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.006

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.