Literature DB >> 23264570

Maximizing the spectral and temporal benefits of two clinically used sound processing strategies for cochlear implants.

Jong Ho Won1, Kaibao Nie, Ward R Drennan, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

Previous work showed that the Fidelity120 processing strategy provides better spectral sensitivity, while the HiResolution processing strategy can deliver more detailed temporal information for Advanced Bionics cochlear implant users. The goal of this study was to develop a new sound processing strategy by maximizing the spectral benefit of Fidelity120 and the temporal benefit of HiResolution to improve both aspects of hearing. Using acoustic simulations of Fidelity120 and HiResolution strategies, a dual-processing strategy was created by combining Fidelity120 in the low frequency channels and HiResolution in the high frequency channels. Compared to Fidelity120, the dual processing provided an improvement in performance for Schroeder-phase discrimination at 200 Hz and temporal modulation detection at 200 Hz with the cost of a slightly decreased performance for spectral-ripple discrimination relative to Fidelity120. Spectral-ripple discrimination was better with the dual processing than with HiResolution. However, no benefit for speech perception in noise was found for the dual-processing strategy over Fidelity 120 or HiResolution in our preliminary tests. Some other more optimal combination of Fidelity120 and HiResolution may be required to maximize the spectral and temporal benefits to yield improved speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23264570      PMCID: PMC3531870          DOI: 10.1177/1084713812467855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  12 in total

1.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

2.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

3.  Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.

Authors:  James M Kates
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; David A Nelson; Heather Kreft; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.

Authors:  Joanne M Eaves; A Quentin Summerfield; Pádraig T Kitterick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Kaibao Nie; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  S P Bacon; N F Viemeister
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1985
View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon; Sunhwa Jin; Heesung Park; Jihwan Woo; Yang-Sun Cho; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Take-Home Trial Comparing Fast Fourier Transformation-Based and Filter Bank-Based Cochlear Implant Speech Coding Strategies.

Authors:  Monique A M de Jong; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Stephen M Camarata; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Robert T Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.