Literature DB >> 21682419

Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.

James M Kates1.   

Abstract

The study of speech from which the temporal fine structure (TFS) has been removed has become an important research area. Common procedures for removing TFS include noise and tone vocoders. In the noise vocoder, bands of noise are modulated by the envelope of the speech within each band, and in the tone vocoder the carrier is a sinusoid at the center of each frequency band. Five different procedures for removing TFS are evaluated in this paper: the noise vocoder, a low-noise noise approach in which the noise envelope is replaced by the speech envelope in each frequency band, phase randomization within each band, the tone vocoder, and sinusoidal modeling with random phase. The effects of TFS modification on the speech envelope are evaluated using an index based on the envelope time-frequency modulation. The results show that for all of the TFS techniques implemented in this study, there is a substantial loss in the accuracy of reproduction of the envelope time-frequency modulation. The tone vocoder gives the best accuracy, followed by the procedure that replaces the noise envelope with the speech envelope in each band.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682419     DOI: 10.1121/1.3583552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

3.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Infants' and Adults' Use of Temporal Cues in Consonant Discrimination.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Lynne Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-12-10

8.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

9.  Maximizing the spectral and temporal benefits of two clinically used sound processing strategies for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-12

10.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.