Literature DB >> 23263967

Phylogenetic distribution of potential cellulases in bacteria.

Renaud Berlemont1, Adam C Martiny.   

Abstract

Many microorganisms contain cellulases that are important for plant cell wall degradation and overall soil ecosystem functioning. At present, we have extensive biochemical knowledge of cellulases but little is known about the phylogenetic distribution of these enzymes. To address this, we analyzed the distribution of 21,985 genes encoding proteins related to cellulose utilization in 5,123 sequenced bacterial genomes. First, we identified the distribution of glycoside hydrolases involved in cellulose utilization and synthesis at different taxonomic levels, from the phylum to the strain. Cellulose degradation/utilization capabilities appeared in nearly all major groups and resulted in strains displaying various enzyme gene combinations. Potential cellulose degraders, having both cellulases and β-glucosidases, constituted 24% of all genomes whereas potential opportunistic strains, having β-glucosidases only, accounted for 56%. Finally, 20% of the bacteria have no relevant enzymes and do not rely on cellulose utilization. The latter group was primarily connected to specific bacterial lifestyles like autotrophy and parasitism. Cellulose degraders, as well as opportunists, have multiple enzymes with similar functions. However, the potential degraders systematically harbor about twice more β-glucosidases than their potential opportunistic relatives. Although scattered, the distribution of functional types, in bacterial lineages, is not random but mostly follows a Brownian motion evolution model. Degraders form clusters of relatives at the species level, whereas opportunists are clustered at the genus level. This information can form a mechanistic basis for the linking of changes in microbial community composition to soil ecosystem processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263967      PMCID: PMC3591946          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03305-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  52 in total

1.  Insights into bacterial cellulose biosynthesis by functional metagenomics on Antarctic soil samples.

Authors:  Renaud Berlemont; Maud Delsaute; Delphine Pipers; Salvino D'Amico; Georges Feller; Moreno Galleni; Pablo Power
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Colloquium paper: resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities.

Authors:  Steven D Allison; Jennifer B H Martiny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale.

Authors:  Robert L Sinsabaugh; Christian L Lauber; Michael N Weintraub; Bony Ahmed; Steven D Allison; Chelsea Crenshaw; Alexandra R Contosta; Daniela Cusack; Serita Frey; Marcy E Gallo; Tracy B Gartner; Sarah E Hobbie; Keri Holland; Bonnie L Keeler; Jennifer S Powers; Martina Stursova; Cristina Takacs-Vesbach; Mark P Waldrop; Matthew D Wallenstein; Donald R Zak; Lydia H Zeglin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Metagenomic mining for microbiologists.

Authors:  Tom O Delmont; Cedric Malandain; Emmanuel Prestat; Catherine Larose; Jean-Michel Monier; Pascal Simonet; Timothy M Vogel
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Enhanced cellulose degradation by targeted integration of a cohesin-fused β-glucosidase into the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome.

Authors:  Gilad Gefen; Michael Anbar; Ely Morag; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Paradoxical conservation of a set of three cellulose-targeting genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms.

Authors:  Felix Mba Medie; Iskandar Ben Salah; Michel Drancourt; Bernard Henrissat
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 7.  Molecular biology of cellulose production in bacteria.

Authors:  Ute Römling
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Penny C Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Chris Boursnell; Ningze Pang; Kristoffer Forslund; Goran Ceric; Jody Clements; Andreas Heger; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation.

Authors:  Yanbin Yin; Xizeng Mao; Jincai Yang; Xin Chen; Fenglou Mao; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  FIGfams: yet another set of protein families.

Authors:  Folker Meyer; Ross Overbeek; Alex Rodriguez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  93 in total

1.  Polysaccharide Degradation Capability of Actinomycetales Soil Isolates from a Semiarid Grassland of the Colorado Plateau.

Authors:  Chris M Yeager; La Verne Gallegos-Graves; John Dunbar; Cedar N Hesse; Hajnalka Daligault; Cheryl R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Forest harvesting reduces the soil metagenomic potential for biomass decomposition.

Authors:  Erick Cardenas; J M Kranabetter; Graeme Hope; Kendra R Maas; Steven Hallam; William W Mohn
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Microbial response to simulated global change is phylogenetically conserved and linked with functional potential.

Authors:  Anthony S Amend; Adam C Martiny; Steven D Allison; Renaud Berlemont; Michael L Goulden; Ying Lu; Kathleen K Treseder; Claudia Weihe; Jennifer B H Martiny
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Microbiota Dynamics Associated with Environmental Conditions and Potential Roles of Cellulolytic Communities in Traditional Chinese Cereal Starter Solid-State Fermentation.

Authors:  Pan Li; Hebin Liang; Wei-Tie Lin; Feng Feng; Lixin Luo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Initial phylogenetic relatedness of saprotrophic fungal communities affects subsequent litter decomposition rates.

Authors:  Stephanie N Kivlin; Kathleen K Treseder
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 6.  Forest Soil Bacteria: Diversity, Involvement in Ecosystem Processes, and Response to Global Change.

Authors:  Salvador Lladó; Rubén López-Mondéjar; Petr Baldrian
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 7.  Physiological and Molecular Understanding of Bacterial Polysaccharide Monooxygenases.

Authors:  Marco Agostoni; John A Hangasky; Michael A Marletta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Metatranscriptomic analysis of arctic peat soil microbiota.

Authors:  Alexander T Tveit; Tim Urich; Mette M Svenning
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Metabolic interdependencies between phylogenetically novel fermenters and respiratory organisms in an unconfined aquifer.

Authors:  Kelly C Wrighton; Cindy J Castelle; Michael J Wilkins; Laura A Hug; Itai Sharon; Brian C Thomas; Kim M Handley; Sean W Mullin; Carrie D Nicora; Andrea Singh; Mary S Lipton; Philip E Long; Kenneth H Williams; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 10.  Evolution and Ecology of Actinobacteria and Their Bioenergy Applications.

Authors:  Gina R Lewin; Camila Carlos; Marc G Chevrette; Heidi A Horn; Bradon R McDonald; Robert J Stankey; Brian G Fox; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 15.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.