Literature DB >> 23263625

Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.

Haemy Lee1, Christian Wallraven.   

Abstract

Humans are experts at shape processing. This expertise has been learned and fine tuned by actively manipulating and perceiving thousands of objects during development. Therefore, shape processing possesses an active component and a perceptual component. Here, we investigate both components in six experiments in which participants view and/or interact with novel, parametrically defined 3D objects using a touch-screen interface. For probing shape processing, we use a similarity rating task. In Experiments 1-3, we show that active manipulation leads to a better perceptual reconstruction of the physical parameter space than judging rotating objects, or passively viewing someone else's exploration pattern. In Experiment 4, we exploit object constancy-the fact that the visual system assumes that objects do not change their identity during manipulation. We show that slow morphing of an object during active manipulation systematically biases similarity ratings-despite the participants being unaware of the morphing. Experiments 5 and 6 investigate the time course of integrating shape information by restricting the morphing to the first and second half of the trial only. Interestingly, the results indicate that participants do not seem to integrate shape information beyond 5 s of exploration time. Finally, Experiment 7 uses a secondary task that suggests that the previous results are not simply due to lack of attention during the later parts of the trial. In summary, our results demonstrate the advantage of active manipulation for shape processing and indicate a continued, perceptual integration of complex shape information within a time window of a few seconds during object interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263625     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3368-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  The relative weight of shape and non-rigid motion cues in object perception: a model of the parameters underlying dynamic object discrimination.

Authors:  Quoc C Vuong; Alinda Friedman; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  An advantage for active versus passive aperture-viewing in visual object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Jasna Martinovic; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  Theresa Cooke; Frank Jäkel; Christian Wallraven; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.

Authors:  Nina Gaissert; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-07-14

6.  Representation of object similarity in human vision: psychophysics and a computational model.

Authors:  F Cutzu; S Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Early biases and developmental changes in self-generated object views.

Authors:  Alfredo F Pereira; Karin H James; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects.

Authors:  Lewis L Chuang; Quoc C Vuong; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  4 in total

1.  Touching on face space: comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes.

Authors:  Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

2.  Make Gestures to Learn: Reproducing Gestures Improves the Learning of Anatomical Knowledge More than Just Seeing Gestures.

Authors:  Mélaine Cherdieu; Olivier Palombi; Silvain Gerber; Jocelyne Troccaz; Amélie Rochet-Capellan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-05

3.  Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Tactile Object Recognition with Robotic Palpation.

Authors:  Francisco Pastor; Juan M Gandarias; Alfonso J García-Cerezo; Jesús M Gómez-de-Gabriel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  The relationship between shape perception accuracy and drawing ability.

Authors:  K E Robles; A J Bies; S Lazarides; M E Sereno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.