Literature DB >> 21752344

Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.

Nina Gaissert1, Heinrich H Bülthoff, Christian Wallraven.   

Abstract

Even though human perceptual development relies on combining multiple modalities, most categorization studies so far have focused on the visual modality. To better understand the mechanisms underlying multisensory categorization, we analyzed visual and haptic perceptual spaces and compared them with human categorization behavior. As stimuli we used a three-dimensional object space of complex, parametrically-defined objects. First, we gathered similarity ratings for all objects and analyzed the perceptual spaces of both modalities using multidimensional scaling analysis. Next, we performed three different categorization tasks which are representative of every-day learning scenarios: in a fully unconstrained task, objects were freely categorized, in a semi-constrained task, exactly three groups had to be created, whereas in a constrained task, participants received three prototype objects and had to assign all other objects accordingly. We found that the haptic modality was on par with the visual modality both in recovering the topology of the physical space and in solving the categorization tasks. We also found that within-category similarity was consistently higher than across-category similarity for all categorization tasks and thus show how perceptual spaces based on similarity can explain visual and haptic object categorization. Our results suggest that both modalities employ similar processes in forming categories of complex objects.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752344     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  Haptic two-dimensional angle categorization and discrimination.

Authors:  Iuliana Toderita; Stéphanie Bourgeon; Julien I A Voisin; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory Part-based Representations of Objects in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  "Can touch this": Cross-modal shape categorization performance is associated with microstructural characteristics of white matter association pathways.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Christian Wallraven; Laurent Petit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.

Authors:  Haemy Lee; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  RUBubbles as a novel tool to study categorization learning.

Authors:  Aylin Apostel; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-10-20

6.  Haptic categorical perception of shape.

Authors:  Nina Gaißert; Steffen Waterkamp; Roland W Fleming; Isabelle Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  From Sensory Signals to Modality-Independent Conceptual Representations: A Probabilistic Language of Thought Approach.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Ilker Yildirim; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Haptic adaptation to slant: No transfer between exploration modes.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Myrthe A Plaisier; Catharina Glowania; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.