Literature DB >> 22308886

An advantage for active versus passive aperture-viewing in visual object recognition.

Matt Craddock1, Jasna Martinovic, Rebecca Lawson.   

Abstract

In aperture viewing the field-of-view is restricted, such that only a small part of an image is visible, enforcing serial exploration of different regions of an object in order to successfully recognise it. Previous studies have used either active control or passive observation of the viewing aperture, but have not contrasted the two modes. Active viewing has previously been shown to confer an advantage in visual object recognition. We displayed objects through a small moveable aperture and tested whether people's ability to identify the images as familiar or novel objects was influenced by how the window location was controlled. Participants recognised objects faster when they actively controlled the window using their finger on a touch-screen, as opposed to passively observing the moving window. There was no difference between passively viewing again one's own window movement as generated in a previous block of trials versus viewing window movements that had been generated by other participants. These results contrast with those from comparable studies of haptic object recognition, which have found a benefit for passive over active stimulus exploration, but accord with findings of an advantage of active viewing in visual object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22308886     DOI: 10.1068/p6974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  Bias and sensitivity of proprioception of a passively felt hand path with and without a secondary task.

Authors:  Blake C W Martin; Kooroush Dehghan; Kooroush Deeghan; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of augmented sensorimotor input on learning verbal and nonverbal tasks among children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Susan O Latham; Ida J Stockman
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-06

3.  Visual experiences during letter production contribute to the development of the neural systems supporting letter perception.

Authors:  Sophia Vinci-Booher; Karin H James
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-04-27

4.  Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.

Authors:  Haemy Lee; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Deconstructing the effect of self-directed study on episodic memory.

Authors:  Douglas Markant; Sarah DuBrow; Lila Davachi; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

6.  Time course of information processing in visual and haptic object classification.

Authors:  Jasna Martinovic; Rebecca Lawson; Matt Craddock
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.