Literature DB >> 22427696

The relative weight of shape and non-rigid motion cues in object perception: a model of the parameters underlying dynamic object discrimination.

Quoc C Vuong1, Alinda Friedman, Jenny C A Read.   

Abstract

Shape and motion are two dominant cues for object recognition, but it can be difficult to investigate their relative quantitative contribution to the recognition process. In the present study, we combined shape and non-rigid motion morphing to investigate the relative contributions of both types of cues to the discrimination of dynamic objects. In Experiment 1, we validated a novel parameter-based motion morphing technique using a single-part three-dimensional object. We then combined shape morphing with the novel motion morphing technique to pairs of multipart objects to create a joint shape and motion similarity space. In Experiment 2, participants were shown pairs of morphed objects from this space and responded "same" on the basis of motion-only, shape-only, or both cues. Both cue types influenced judgments: When responding to only one cue, the other cue could be ignored, although shape cues were more difficult to ignore. When responding on the basis of both cues, there was an overall bias to weight shape cues more than motion cues. Overall, our results suggest that shape influences discrimination more than motion even when both cue types have been made quantitatively equivalent in terms of their individual discriminability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22427696     DOI: 10.1167/12.3.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  3 in total

1.  Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.

Authors:  Haemy Lee; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Behavioral Differences in the Upper and Lower Visual Hemifields in Shape and Motion Perception.

Authors:  Giuseppe A Zito; Dario Cazzoli; René M Müri; Urs P Mosimann; Tobias Nef
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Near-optimal integration of facial form and motion.

Authors:  Katharina Dobs; Wei Ji Ma; Leila Reddy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.