Literature DB >> 19815694

A multicenter blinded study to evaluate KRAS mutation testing methodologies in the clinical setting.

Vicki Whitehall1, Kayla Tran, Aarti Umapathy, Fabienne Grieu, Chelsee Hewitt, Tiffany-Jane Evans, Tuty Ismail, Wei Qi Li, Peter Collins, Paul Ravetto, Barbara Leggett, Manuel Salto-Tellez, Richie Soong, Stephen Fox, Rodney J Scott, Alexander Dobrovic, Barry Iacopetta.   

Abstract

Evidence that activating mutations of the KRAS oncogene abolish the response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. This has resulted in the urgent demand for KRAS mutation testing in the clinical setting to aid choice of therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate six different KRAS mutation detection methodologies on two series of primary colorectal cancer samples. Two series of 80 frozen and 74 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were sourced and DNA was extracted at a central site before distribution to seven different testing sites. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 were assessed by using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis, pyrosequencing, high resolution melting analysis, dideoxy sequencing, or the commercially available TIB Molbiol (Berlin, Germany) or DxS Diagnostic Innovations (Manchester, UK) kits. In frozen tissue samples, concordance in KRAS status (defined as consensus in at least five assays) was observed in 66/80 (83%) cases. In paraffin tissue, concordance was 46/74 (63%) if all assays were considered or 71/74 (96%) using the five best performing assays. These results demonstrate that a variety of detection methodologies are suitable and provide comparable results for KRAS mutation analysis of clinical samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815694      PMCID: PMC2765753          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.090057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  24 in total

1.  A case for integrated morphomolecular diagnostic pathologists.

Authors:  Manuel Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the multicenter "RASCAL" study.

Authors:  H J Andreyev; A R Norman; D Cunningham; J R Oates; P A Clarke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  The epidermal growth factor receptor as a target for colorectal cancer therapy.

Authors:  A Craig Lockhart; Craig Lockhart; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Takako Kawasaki; Mohan Brahmandam; Liying Yan; Mami Cantor; Chungdak Namgyal; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Massimo Loda; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Recurrent KRAS codon 146 mutations in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Edkins; Sarah O'Meara; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Marcelo Reis; Siân Jones; Chris Greenman; Helen Davies; Gillian Dalgliesh; Simon Forbes; Chris Hunter; Raffaella Smith; Philip Stephens; Peter Goldstraw; Andrew Nicholson; Tsun Leung Chan; Victor E Velculescu; Siu Tsan Yuen; Suet Yi Leung; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Astrid Lièvre; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Delphine Le Corre; Valérie Boige; Bruno Landi; Jean-François Emile; Jean-François Côté; Gorana Tomasic; Christophe Penna; Michel Ducreux; Philippe Rougier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Pierre Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  Shirin Khambata-Ford; Christopher R Garrett; Neal J Meropol; Mark Basik; Christopher T Harbison; Shujian Wu; Tai W Wong; Xin Huang; Chris H Takimoto; Andrew K Godwin; Benjamin R Tan; Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Howard A Burris; Elizabeth A Poplin; Manuel Hidalgo; Jose Baselga; Edwin A Clark; David J Mauro
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prognostic markers of colorectal cancer: an evaluation of DNA content, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Ki-67.

Authors:  A W Hemming; N L Davis; A Kluftinger; B Robinson; N F Quenville; B Liseman; J LeRiche
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael Krypuy; Genni M Newnham; David M Thomas; Matthew Conron; Alexander Dobrovic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy.

Authors:  Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  43 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and QMC-PCR in conjunction with high resolution melting for KRAS/BRAF mutation detection.

Authors:  Salih Ibrahem; Rashmi Seth; Brendan O'Sullivan; Wakkas Fadhil; Philippe Taniere; Mohammad Ilyas
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

3.  External quality assessment for KRAS testing is needed: setup of a European program and report of the first joined regional quality assessment rounds.

Authors:  Ellen Bellon; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Sabine Tejpar; Karen Cox; Gert de Hertogh; Karin de Stricker; Anders Edsjö; Vassilis Gorgoulis; Gerald Höfler; Andreas Jung; Athanassios Kotsinas; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Fernando López-Ríos; Tine Plato Hansen; Etienne Rouleau; Peter Vandenberghe; Johan J M van Krieken; Elisabeth Dequeker
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-03-26

4.  Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis and FISH for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in cytology specimens collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kipp; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Amy C Clayton; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts; Jun Zhang; Michael J Levy; Kevin C Halling
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  KRAS mutation analysis on low percentage of colon cancer cells: the importance of quality assurance.

Authors:  J R Dijkstra; D A M Heideman; G A Meijer; J E Boers; N A 't Hart; J Diebold; A Hirschmann; G Hoefler; G Winter; G Miltenberger-Miltenyi; S V Pereira; S D Richman; P Quirke; E L Rouleau; J M Guinebretiere; S Tejpar; B Biesmans; J H J M van Krieken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cong Tan; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests.

Authors:  Kelly Oliner; Todd Juan; Sid Suggs; Michael Wolf; Ildiko Sarosi; Daniel J Freeman; Tibor Gyuris; Will Baron; Andreas Bakker; Alex Parker; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Simplifying the detection of MUTYH mutations by high resolution melting analysis.

Authors:  Isabel López-Villar; Rosa Ayala; Jan Wesselink; Juan Diego Morillas; Elena López; José Carlos Marín; José Díaz-Tasende; Sara González; Luis Robles; Joaquín Martínez-López
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A comparison of four methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed specimens from metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Mototsugu Matsunaga; Toshikado Kaneta; Keisuke Miwa; Wataru Ichikawa; Ken-Ichi Fujita; Fumio Nagashima; Junji Furuse; Masayoshi Kage; Yoshito Akagi; Yasutsuna Sasaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  A clinicopathological and molecular analysis of 200 traditional serrated adenomas.

Authors:  Mark L Bettington; Neal I Walker; Christophe Rosty; Ian S Brown; Andrew D Clouston; Diane M McKeone; Sally-Ann Pearson; Kerenaftali Klein; Barbara A Leggett; Vicki L J Whitehall
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.