Literature DB >> 18316791

Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Rafael G Amado1, Michael Wolf, Marc Peeters, Eric Van Cutsem, Salvatore Siena, Daniel J Freeman, Todd Juan, Robert Sikorski, Sid Suggs, Robert Radinsky, Scott D Patterson, David D Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Panitumumab, a fully human antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has activity in a subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although activating mutations in KRAS, a small G-protein downstream of EGFR, correlate with poor response to anti-EGFR antibodies in mCRC, their role as a selection marker has not been established in randomized trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: KRAS mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction on DNA from tumor sections collected in a phase III mCRC trial comparing panitumumab monotherapy to best supportive care (BSC). We tested whether the effect of panitumumab on progression-free survival (PFS) differed by KRAS status.
RESULTS: KRAS status was ascertained in 427 (92%) of 463 patients (208 panitumumab, 219 BSC). KRAS mutations were found in 43% of patients. The treatment effect on PFS in the wild-type (WT) KRAS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.59) was significantly greater (P < .0001) than in the mutant group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.36). Median PFS in the WT KRAS group was 12.3 weeks for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks for BSC. Response rates to panitumumab were 17% and 0%, for the WT and mutant groups, respectively. WT KRAS patients had longer overall survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82; treatment arms combined). Consistent with longer exposure, more grade III treatment-related toxicities occurred in the WT KRAS group. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the WT KRAS group and the overall population.
CONCLUSION: Panitumumab monotherapy efficacy in mCRC is confined to patients with WT KRAS tumors. KRAS status should be considered in selecting patients with mCRC as candidates for panitumumab monotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316791     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  1155 in total

1.  Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Efsevia Vakiani; Manickam Janakiraman; Ronglai Shen; Rileen Sinha; Zhaoshi Zeng; Jinru Shia; Andrea Cercek; Nancy Kemeny; Michael D'Angelica; Agnes Viale; Adriana Heguy; Philip Paty; Timothy A Chan; Leonard B Saltz; Martin Weiser; David B Solit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives on the clinical drug development of panitumumab.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Peggy Lum; Alin Chen; Rosalin Arends; Lorin Roskos; Brian Smith; Juan José Pérez Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Aberrant signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer: a two compartment view.

Authors:  Angela L McCleary-Wheeler; Robert McWilliams; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 5.  Part 1: background, methodology, and clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 6.  Reovirus: a targeted therapeutic--progress and potential.

Authors:  Radhashree Maitra; Mohammad H Ghalib; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 7.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer anti-EGFR therapy.

Authors:  Cristiana Lo Nigro; Vincenzo Ricci; Daniela Vivenza; Cristina Granetto; Teresa Fabozzi; Emanuela Miraglio; Marco C Merlano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Chiara Cremolini; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Antonio Russo; Francesco Mannavola; Giuseppe Perrone; Francesco Pantano; Fotios Loupakis; Daniele Rossini; Elena Ongaro; Erica Bonazzina; Emanuela Dell'Aquila; Marco Imperatori; Alice Zoccoli; Giuseppe Bronte; Giovanna De Maglio; Gabriella Fontanini; Clara Natoli; Alfredo Falcone; Daniele Santini; Andrea Onetti-Muda; Salvatore Siena; Giuseppe Tonini; Giuseppe Aprile
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 9.  Tumor heterogeneity in the clinic: is it a real problem?

Authors:  Filip Janku
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 10.  The role of targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marwan Fakih
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.