Literature DB >> 23231301

Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Raymond J Acciavatti1, Andrew D A Maidment.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a 3D x-ray imaging modality in which tomographic sections of the breast are generated from a limited range of tube angles. Because oblique x-ray incidence shifts the image of an object in subpixel detector element increments with each increasing projection angle, it is demonstrated that DBT is capable of super-resolution (i.e., subpixel resolution).
METHODS: By convention, DBT reconstructions are performed on planes parallel to the breast support at various depths of the breast volume. In order for resolution in each reconstructed slice to be comparable to the detector, the pixel size should match that of the detector elements; hence, the highest frequency that can be resolved in the plane of reconstruction is the alias frequency of the detector. This study considers reconstruction grids with much smaller pixelation to visualize higher frequencies. For analytical proof of super-resolution, a theoretical framework is developed in which the reconstruction of a high frequency sinusoidal input is calculated using both simple backprojection (SBP) and filtered backprojection. To study the frequency spectrum of the reconstruction, its Fourier transform is also determined. The experimental feasibility of super-resolution was investigated by acquiring images of a bar pattern phantom with frequencies higher than the detector alias frequency.
RESULTS: Using analytical modeling, it is shown that the central projection cannot resolve frequencies exceeding the detector alias frequency. The Fourier transform of the central projection is maximized at a lower frequency than the input as evidence of aliasing. By contrast, SBP reconstruction can resolve the input, and its Fourier transform is correctly maximized at the input frequency. Incorporating filters into the reconstruction smoothens pixelation artifacts in the spatial domain and reduces spectral leakage in the Fourier domain. It is also demonstrated that the existence of super-resolution is dependent on position in the reconstruction and on the directionality of the input frequency. Consistent with the analytical results, experimental reconstructions of bar patterns showed visibility of frequencies greater than the detector alias frequency. Super-resolution was present at positions predicted from analytical modeling.
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the existence of super-resolution in DBT. Super-resolution has the potential to impact the visualization of fine structural details in the breast, such as microcalcifications and other subtle signs of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231301      PMCID: PMC3523583          DOI: 10.1118/1.4757583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Linear response theory for detectors consisting of discrete arrays.

Authors:  M Albert; A D Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra.

Authors:  D M Tucker; G T Barnes; D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Ghosting caused by bulk charge trapping in direct conversion flat-panel detectors using amorphous selenium.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; G DeCrescenzo; Safa O Kasap; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.

Authors:  M M Blough; R G Waggener; W H Payne; J A Terry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Fewell; R J Jennings
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution.

Authors:  W Que; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues.

Authors:  P C Johns; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.

Authors:  Aili K Bloomquist; Martin J Yaffe; Gordon E Mawdsley; David M Hunter; Daniel J Beideck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Raymond J Acciavatti; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.

Authors:  Raymond J Acciavatti; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. I. Linear systems theory.

Authors:  Raymond J Acciavatti; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Mark A Helvie; Scott Zelakiewicz; Andrea Schmitz; Mitra Noroozian; Chintana Paramagul; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Alexis V Nees; Colleen H Neal; Paul Carson; Yao Lu; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jun Wei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?

Authors:  Greeshma A Agasthya; Ellen D'Orsi; Yoon-Jin Kim; Priyanka Handa; Christopher P Ho; Carl J D'Orsi; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiabei Zheng; Jeffrey A Fessler; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation.

Authors:  Robyn Gartner Roth; Andrew D A Maidment; Susan P Weinstein; Susan Orel Roth; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiabei Zheng; Jeffrey A Fessler; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.