Literature DB >> 23218172

ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.

P-L Khong, H Ringertz, V Donoghue, D Frush, M Rehani, K Appelgate, R Sanchez.   

Abstract

Paediatric patients have a higher average risk of developing cancer compared with adults receiving the same dose. The longer life expectancy in children allows more time for any harmful effects of radiation to manifest, and developing organs and tissues are more sensitive to the effects of radiation. This publication aims to provide guiding principles of radiological protection for referring clinicians and clinical staff performing diagnostic imaging and interventional procedures for paediatric patients. It begins with a brief description of the basic concepts of radiological protection, followed by the general aspects of radiological protection, including principles of justification and optimisation. Guidelines and suggestions for radiological protection in specific modalities - radiography and fluoroscopy, interventional radiology, and computed tomography - are subsequently covered in depth. The report concludes with a summary and recommendations. The importance of rigorous justification of radiological procedures is emphasised for every procedure involving ionising radiation, and the use of imaging modalities that are non-ionising should always be considered. The basic aim of optimisation of radiological protection is to adjust imaging parameters and institute protective measures such that the required image is obtained with the lowest possible dose of radiation, and that net benefit is maximised to maintain sufficient quality for diagnostic interpretation. Special consideration should be given to the availability of dose reduction measures when purchasing new imaging equipment for paediatric use. One of the unique aspects of paediatric imaging is with regards to the wide range in patient size (and weight), therefore requiring special attention to optimisation and modification of equipment, technique, and imaging parameters. Examples of good radiographic and fluoroscopic technique include attention to patient positioning, field size and adequate collimation, use of protective shielding, optimisation of exposure factors, use of pulsed fluoroscopy, limiting fluoroscopy time, etc. Major paediatric interventional procedures should be performed by experienced paediatric interventional operators, and a second, specific level of training in radiological protection is desirable (in some countries, this is mandatory). For computed tomography, dose reduction should be optimised by the adjustment of scan parameters (such as mA, kVp, and pitch) according to patient weight or age, region scanned, and study indication (e.g. images with greater noise should be accepted if they are of sufficient diagnostic quality). Other strategies include restricting multiphase examination protocols, avoiding overlapping of scan regions, and only scanning the area in question. Up-to-date dose reduction technology such as tube current modulation, organ-based dose modulation, auto kV technology, and iterative reconstruction should be utilised when appropriate. It is anticipated that this publication will assist institutions in encouraging the standardisation of procedures, and that it may help increase awareness and ultimately improve practices for the benefit of patients.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23218172     DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann ICRP        ISSN: 0146-6453


  69 in total

1.  The impact of pediatric-specific dose modulation curves on radiation dose and image quality in head computed tomography.

Authors:  Joana Santos; Shane Foley; Graciano Paulo; Mark F McEntee; Louise Rainford
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-05

2.  Imaging in children with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction: time to reduce investigations?

Authors:  Nadin Abadir; Maria Schmidt; Guido F Laube; Marcus Weitz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules--mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection.

Authors:  Julie A Reisz; Nidhi Bansal; Jiang Qian; Weiling Zhao; Cristina M Furdui
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Correction of hypokyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using sublaminar bands: a 3D multicenter study.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Sébastien Pesenti; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Franck Accadbled; Jean-Luc Jouve; Jérôme Sales De Gauzy; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Marianne Alison; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patient radiation doses and reference levels in pediatric interventional radiology.

Authors:  Bouchra Habib Geryes; Adeline Bak; Julie Lachaux; Augustin Ozanne; Nathalie Boddaert; Francis Brunelle; Olivier Naggara; Guillaume Saliou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  European Guidelines for AP/PA chest X-rays: routinely satisfiable in a paediatric radiology division?

Authors:  Sebastian Tschauner; Robert Marterer; Michael Gübitz; Peter I Kalmar; Emina Talakic; Sabine Weissensteiner; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-03-20

9.  Optimization of image quality and patient dose in radiographs of paediatric extremities using direct digital radiography.

Authors:  A Jones; C Ansell; C Jerrom; I D Honey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Pre-procedural scout radiographs are unnecessary for routine pediatric fluoroscopic examinations.

Authors:  Sean G Creeden; Anil G Rao; Meryle J Eklund; Jeanne G Hill; Paul G Thacker
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.