Joana Santos1, Shane Foley2, Graciano Paulo3, Mark F McEntee4, Louise Rainford2. 1. Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC, DMIR, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal. joanasantos@estescoimbra.pt. 2. School of Medicine & Medical Science, Health Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. 3. Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC, DMIR, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The volume of CT examinations has increased with resultant increases in collective dose values over the last decade. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the tube current and voltage modulation for dose values and image quality of pediatric head CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Head CT examinations were performed on anthropomorphic phantoms and four pediatric age categories before and after the introduction of dedicated pediatric curves for tube voltage and current modulation. Local diagnostic reference levels were calculated. Visual grading characteristic image quality evaluation was performed by four pediatric neuroradiologists and image noise comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Pediatric-specific modulation curves demonstrated a 49% decrease in mean radiation dose for phantom examinations. The local diagnostic reference levels (CTDIvol) for clinical examinations decreased by 52%, 41%, 46% and 40% for newborn, 5-, 10- and 15-year-old patients, respectively. Visual grading characteristic image quality was maintained for the majority of age categorizations (area under the curve = 0.5) and image noise measurements did not change (P = 0.693). CONCLUSION: Pediatric-specific dose modulation curves resulted in an overall mean dose reduction of 45% with no significant differences in subjective or objective image quality findings.
BACKGROUND: The volume of CT examinations has increased with resultant increases in collective dose values over the last decade. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the tube current and voltage modulation for dose values and image quality of pediatric head CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Head CT examinations were performed on anthropomorphic phantoms and four pediatric age categories before and after the introduction of dedicated pediatric curves for tube voltage and current modulation. Local diagnostic reference levels were calculated. Visual grading characteristic image quality evaluation was performed by four pediatric neuroradiologists and image noise comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Pediatric-specific modulation curves demonstrated a 49% decrease in mean radiation dose for phantom examinations. The local diagnostic reference levels (CTDIvol) for clinical examinations decreased by 52%, 41%, 46% and 40% for newborn, 5-, 10- and 15-year-old patients, respectively. Visual grading characteristic image quality was maintained for the majority of age categorizations (area under the curve = 0.5) and image noise measurements did not change (P = 0.693). CONCLUSION: Pediatric-specific dose modulation curves resulted in an overall mean dose reduction of 45% with no significant differences in subjective or objective image quality findings.
Authors: Courtney Coursey; Donald P Frush; Terry Yoshizumi; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; S Bruce Greenberg Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Markus Håkansson; Sune Svensson; Sara Zachrisson; Angelica Svalkvist; Magnus Båth; Lars Gunnar Månsson Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: H Järvinen; K Merimaa; R Seuri; E Tyrväinen; M Perhomaa; P Savikurki-Heikkilä; E Svedström; J Ziliukas; M Lintrop Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: K Fujii; T Aoyama; C Yamauchi-Kawaura; S Koyama; M Yamauchi; S Ko; K Akahane; K Nishizawa Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael A Moore; Randheer Shailam; Bob Liu; Thomas L Toth; Ellen Grant; Sjirk J Westra Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andrew J Kobets; Adam Ammar; Jonathan Nakhla; Aleka Scoco; Rani Nasser; James T Goodrich; Rick Abbott Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 1.475