Literature DB >> 28612190

Correction of hypokyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using sublaminar bands: a 3D multicenter study.

Brice Ilharreborde1, Sébastien Pesenti2, Emmanuelle Ferrero3, Franck Accadbled4, Jean-Luc Jouve2, Jérôme Sales De Gauzy4, Keyvan Mazda3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The comparison of implants and correction methods remain controversial in AIS. Excellent frontal and axial correction rates have been reported with all-screw constructs, but at the expense of sagittal alignment, which has a tendency to flatten postoperatively. Posteromedial translation using hybrid constructs seems to preserve and improve thoracic kyphosis (TK), but no series exist to date with a significant number of hypokyphotic patients. In addition, the measures of TK in 2D are often wrong in severe AIS due to axial rotation. The goals of this study were therefore to analyze the 3D radiological outcomes of a group of hypokyphotic AIS patients operated with sublaminar bands.
METHODS: 35 consecutive AIS hypokyphotic patients (T4T12 <15°) operated in three centers were included, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The surgical technique was similar in all centers, associating lumbar pedicle screws and thoracic sublaminar bands. Posteromedial translation was the main correction technique, and no patient underwent prior anterior release. 3D spinal reconstructions were performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at the latest follow-up by an independent observer using SterEOS (EOS imaging, Paris, France), and 2D and 3D measurements were compared. In addition, a new 3D parameter [sagittal shift of the apical vertebra (SSAV)], reflecting the translation of the apical vertebra of the main curve in the patient sagittal plane, was described and reported.
RESULTS: The age of the cohort was 16 years and the number of sublaminar bands used for correction averaged 6 (±1.5). T1T12 and T4T12 sagittal Cobb angles appeared to be overestimated on 2D postoperatively (3°, p = 0.002 and 4°, p < 0.001, respectively). Hence, only 3D measurements were kept for the quantitative analysis of the postoperative correction. T4T12 TK significantly increased after surgery (average 8° ± 7°, p < 0.001), but 11 patients (31.4%) remained hypokyphotic. Seven out of the eight patients (87.5%) who presented a thoracic lordosis (i.e., T4T12 <0°) preoperatively were corrected after surgery (mean gain 16° ± 4°). A posterior shift (positive SSAV) of the apical vertebra was reported in 24 patients (68.6%). In this subgroup, the mean SSAV was +2 cm (±1). Good correlation was found between the SSAV and the postoperative change in 3D T4T12 kyphosis (r = 0.62).
CONCLUSION: Measures in 2D tend to overestimate sagittal alignment and are not sufficient to evaluate postoperative correction. SSAV is a new 3D parameter reflecting the TK change that needs to be further investigated and used in the future. This series confirms that sublaminar bands should be considered in hypokyphotic patients, since thoracic sagittal alignment was restored in 68.6% of the cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D analysis; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Hypokyphosis; Sagittal alignment; Stereoradiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28612190     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5166-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Preservation of thoracic kyphosis is critical to maintain lumbar lordosis in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Jeff B Pawelek; Tracey P Bastrom; Lawrence G Lenke; Thomas Lowe; Alvin Crawford; Randal Betz; Baron Lonner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.

Authors:  Jason E Lowenstein; Hiroko Matsumoto; Michael G Vitale; Mark Weidenbaum; Jaime A Gomez; Francis Young-In Lee; Joshua E Hyman; David P Roye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  How much correction is enough?

Authors:  Robert B Winter; John E Lonstein; Francis Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Direct Vertebral Rotation Versus Single Concave Rod Rotation: Low-dose Intraoperative Computed Tomography Evaluation of Spine Derotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery.

Authors:  Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Marcin Ceynowa; Marcin Mikulicz; Tomasz Mazurek; Wojciech Kloc
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Christophe Vidal; Brice Ilharreborde; Robin Azoulay; Guy Sebag; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Increasing hospital charges for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the United States.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Sergio A Mendoza-Lattes; Ryan M Ilgenfritz; John J Callaghan; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus.

Authors:  Marinus de Kleuver; Stephen J Lewis; Niccole M Germscheid; Steven J Kamper; Ahmet Alanay; Sigurd H Berven; Kenneth M Cheung; Manabu Ito; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Maurits van Tulder; Christopher Shaffrey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Residual thoracic hypokyphosis after posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and clinical ramifications.

Authors:  Nicholas D Fletcher; Jeffrey Hopkins; Anna McClung; Richard Browne; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis causes hypokyphosis of the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Takayuki Nakamura; Akio Iwanami; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Pulmonary function changes and its influencing factors after preoperative brace treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Bo Ran; Yuxin Fan; Feng Yuan; Kaijin Guo; Xiaodong Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Sagittal balance and idiopathic scoliosis: does final sagittal alignment influence outcomes, degeneration rate or failure rate?

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of four correction techniques for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Jean-Luc Clément; Brice Ilharreborde; Christian Morin; Yann Philippe Charles; Henri François Parent; Philippe Violas; Marc Szadkowski; Louis Boissière; Jean-Luc Jouve; Federico Solla
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of spinal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of two distinct techniques.

Authors:  Jakub Sikora-Klak; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Brice Ilharreborde; Madeline Cross; Tracey P Bastrom; Keyvan Mazda; Burt Yaszay; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Surgical increase in thoracic kyphosis increases unfused lumbar lordosis in selective fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Clément; Yann Pelletier; Federico Solla; Virginie Rampal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Spinal sagittal alignment and head control in patients with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Adrien de Saint Etienne; Ana Presedo; Anne-Laure Simon
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Double Sublaminal Band Passage Technique for Spinal Deformity Correction.

Authors:  Blake K Montgomery; Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Craig M Birch; Grant Hogue
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.