| Literature DB >> 23209578 |
Yuji Kashiwakura1, Jun Mimuro, Akira Onishi, Masaki Iwamoto, Seiji Madoiwa, Daiichiro Fuchimoto, Shunichi Suzuki, Misae Suzuki, Shoichiro Sembon, Akira Ishiwata, Atsushi Yasumoto, Asuka Sakata, Tsukasa Ohmori, Michiko Hashimoto, Satoko Yazaki, Yoichi Sakata.
Abstract
Hemophilia A is a common X chromosome-linked genetic bleeding disorder caused by abnormalities in the coagulation factor VIII gene (F8). Hemophilia A patients suffer from a bleeding diathesis, such as life-threatening bleeding in the brain and harmful bleeding in joints and muscles. Because it could potentially be cured by gene therapy, subhuman animal models have been sought. Current mouse hemophilia A models generated by gene targeting of the F8 have difficulties to extrapolate human disease due to differences in the coagulation and immune systems between mice and humans. Here, we generated a porcine model of hemophilia A by nuclear transfer cloning from F8-targeted fibroblasts. The hemophilia A pigs showed a severe bleeding tendency upon birth, similar to human severe hemophiliacs, but in contrast to hemophilia A mice which rarely bleed under standard breed conditions. Infusion of human factor VIII was effective in stopping bleeding and reducing the bleeding frequency of a hemophilia A piglet but was blocked by the inhibitor against human factor VIII. These data suggest that the hemophilia A pig is a severe hemophilia A animal model for studying not only hemophilia A gene therapy but also the next generation recombinant coagulation factors, such as recombinant factor VIII variants with a slower clearance rate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23209578 PMCID: PMC3509096 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1F8 targeting of porcine fetal fibroblasts (PEF).
(A) Schematic diagram of part of porcine F8, the positions of the restriction endonuclease sites, the F8 targeting vector structure, and the targeted F8 (F8 KO) allele are shown. The neomycin-resistance gene (PGK-neo) was inserted in the exon 16 DNA fragment with deletion of a part of exon 16 and was flanked by two F8 DNA fragments (5′ arm: 3.2 kb; 3′ arm: 4.1 kb) in F8 targeting vector. The positions of PCR primers (arrowheads), expected amplified DNA fragments (bars), and restriction endonuclease sites used for the Southern blot analysis are indicated in the schema for F8 KO. (B) F8 exon 14–18 PCR on genomic DNA from non-transfected PEF (WT), PEF colony 134 (134), and three other PEF colonies (135–137) was shown. (C) The F8 exon 14–18 PCR products were treated with Stu I and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. (D) PCR analyses with two sets of primer pairs for exon 14 and the neomycin resistance gene and for the neomycin resistance gene and exon 22 were shown.
Figure 2F8 targeting and genetic analysis of the colony 134-derived fetus.
PCR analysis of genomic DNA of 134-fetus was shown. (A) Two or three independent PCR reactions were carried out for detection of recombination in F8 of 134-fetus. (B) Southern blotting with a 5′ exon 14 probe (on Sac I− or Sac I + Stu I-digested DNA) and with a 3′ exon 22 probe (on Sph I− or Xba I-digested DNA) showed correct targeting of the F8 in 134-fetus.
Figure 3Analysis of the F8 in cloned piglets.
(A) PCR analysis of genomic DNA of piglet DNA was shown. Genomic DNA of wild-type, 134-fetus, piglet #1, piglet #2, piglet #3, and piglet #4 was subjected to PCR analysis with primers Exon 14 sF and Exon 18 sR as in Figure 1. The 8.3 kb exon 14–18 band was amplified from the 134-fetus DNA and the cloned piglet DNA. (B) Southern blotting with a 5′ exon 14 probe (on Sac I− or Sac I + Stu I-digested DNA) showed the same mobility shifts of the bands as those in Figure 2 and confirmed the insertion of the Neo resistant gene in F8 of the cloned piglets. (C) RT-PCR analysis of piglet liver RNA was shown. Two independent PCRs (exons 14–16 and exons 18–22) revealed the absence of FVIII mRNA from the liver of cloned piglet #3. Control GAPDH mRNA was detected in the liver RNA of piglet #3 as in the wild type (WT).
Coagulation factor activity of piglets #3 and #4.
| Coagulation factor | Wild type (n = 4) | Piglet #3 | Piglet #4 |
| Fibrinogen (µmol/L) | 2.67±1.39 | 1.56 | ND |
| Factor II (%) | 75.7±3.9 | 53 | 47 |
| Factor V (%) | >200 | 118 | 168 |
| Factor VII (%) | 68.5±3.4 | 19 | 19 |
| Factor VIII (%) | >200 | 1> | 1> |
| Factor IX (%) | >200 | 96 | 69 |
| Factor X (%) | 134±7.0 | 72 | 64 |
The coagulation factor levels of piglet #3 and #4 are shown with the control coagulation factor levels of wild-type piglets. Each coagulation factor activity was calculated from the standard curve generated with normal human plasma and expressed as the percentage of the respective coagulation factor activity in normal human plasma.
ND: not determined.
Figure 4The bleeding phenotype of cloned F8 KO piglets.
(A) A part of macroscopic picture of cloned piglet #1, which died by day 2 after birth is shown. Ecchymosis was seen in the cheek, the forelimb, and the hind limb (not shown). Pathological examination revealed hematomas in these areas of piglet #1. (B) Forelimb of cloned piglet #4 on day 1 after delivery was shown. Ecchymosis had been seen in the left forelimb of cloned piglet #4 since delivery. (C) On day 5 after administration of human FVIII (150 U/kg), the bleeding in the left forelimb was not observed. Macroscopic picture of cloned piglet #4 on day 28 after birth showed that the left forelimb was swollen because of the repeated bleeding (D), causing the piglet to limp (also see video 1).