Literature DB >> 17849457

Serial cloning of pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer: restoration of phenotypic normality during serial cloning.

Seong-Keun Cho1, Jae-Hwan Kim, Jong-Yi Park, Yun-Jung Choi, Jae-Il Bang, Kyu-Chan Hwang, Eun-Jeong Cho, Sea-Hwan Sohn, Sang Jun Uhm, Deog-Bon Koo, Kyung-Kwang Lee, Teoan Kim, Jin-Hoi Kim.   

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (scNT) is a useful way to create cloned animals. However, scNT clones exhibit high levels of phenotypic instability. This instability may be due to epigenetic reprogramming and/or genomic damage in the donor cells. To test this, we produced transgenic pig fibroblasts harboring the truncated human thrombopoietin (hTPO) gene and used them as donor cells in scNT to produce first-generation (G1) cloned piglets. In this study, 2,818 scNT embryos were transferred to 11 recipients and five G1 piglets were obtained. Among them, a clone had a dimorphic facial appearance with severe hypertelorism and a broad prominent nasal bridge. The other clones looked normal. Second-generation (G2) scNT piglets were then produced using ear cells from a G1 piglet that had an abnormal nose phenotype. We reasoned that, if the phenotypic abnormality of the G1 clone was not present in the G2 and third-generation (G3) clones, or was absent in the G2 clones but reappeared in the G3 clones, the phenotypic instability of the G1 clone could be attributed to faulty epigenetic reprogramming rather than to inherent/accidental genomic damage to the donor cells. Blastocyst rates, cell numbers in blastocyst, pregnancy rates, term placenta weight and ponderal index, and birth weight between G1 and G2 clones did not differ, but were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than control age- and sex-matched piglets. Next, we analyzed global methylation changes during development of the preimplantation embryos reconstructed by donor cells used for the production of G1 and G2 clones and could not find any significant differences in the methylation patterns between G1 and G2 clones. Indeed, we failed to detect the phenotypic abnormality in the G2 and G3 clones. Thus, the phenotypic abnormality of the G1 clone is likely to be due to epigenetic dysregulation. Additional observations then suggested that expression of the hTPO gene in the transgenic clones did not appear to be the cause of the phenotypic abnormality in the G1 clones and that the abnormality was acquired by only a few of the G1 clone's cells during its gestational development. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17849457     DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.21308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  24 in total

1.  Altered gene expression profiles in the brain, kidney, and lung of deceased neonatal cloned pigs.

Authors:  Joonghoon Park; Sadie L Marjani; Liangxue Lai; Melissa Samuel; David Wax; Steven R Davis; Richard S Bruno; Randall S Prather; Xiangzhong Yang; Xiuchun Cindy Tian
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Porcine skin-derived stem cells can serve as donor cells for nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Yanhong Hao; David Wax; Zhisheng Zhong; Clifton Murphy; Jason W Ross; August Rieke; Melissa Samuel; Lee Spate; Paul Dyce; Julang Li; Peter Sutovsky; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2009-03

3.  The growth and reproduction performance of TALEN-mediated β-lactoglobulin-knockout bucks.

Authors:  Hengtao Ge; Chenchen Cui; Jun Liu; Yan Luo; Fusheng Quan; Yaping Jin; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Dystrophin-deficient large animal models: translational research and exon skipping.

Authors:  Xinran Yu; Bo Bao; Yusuke Echigoya; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Genetically modified pigs for biomedical research.

Authors:  Yonglun Luo; Lin Lin; Lars Bolund; Thomas G Jensen; Charlotte Brandt Sørensen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Generation of CMAHKO/GTKO/shTNFRI-Fc/HO-1 quadruple gene modified pigs.

Authors:  Geon A Kim; Eun Mi Lee; Jun-Xue Jin; Sanghoon Lee; Anukul Taweechaipaisankul; Jong Ik Hwang; Zahid Alam; Curie Ahn; Byeong Chun Lee
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Factors Determining the Efficiency of Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Data Analysis with Over 200,000 Reconstructed Embryos.

Authors:  Tianbin Liu; Hongwei Dou; Xi Xiang; Lin Li; Yong Li; Lin Lin; Xinzhi Pang; Yijie Zhang; Yu Chen; Jing Luan; Ying Xu; Zhenzhen Yang; Wenxian Yang; Huan Liu; Feida Li; Hui Wang; Huanming Yang; Lars Bolund; Gabor Vajta; Yutao Du
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression in bovine somatic cell chromatin transfer embryos.

Authors:  Nelida Rodriguez-Osorio; Zhongde Wang; Poothappillai Kasinathan; Grier P Page; James M Robl; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparative proteomic analysis of malformed umbilical cords from somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived piglets: implications for early postnatal death.

Authors:  Jong-Yi Park; Jae-Hwan Kim; Yun-Jung Choi; Kyu-Chan Hwang; Seong-Keun Cho; Ho-Hyun Park; Seung-Sam Paik; Teoan Kim; Chankyu Park; Hoon Taek Lee; Han Geuk Seo; Soo-Bong Park; Seongsoo Hwang; Jin-Hoi Kim
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.