Literature DB >> 23197186

Implementing a breast cancer registry and treatment plan/summary program in clinical practice: a pilot program.

Ann H Partridge1, Virginia W Norris, Victoria S Blinder, Bruce A Cutter, Michael T Halpern, Jennifer Malin, Michael N Neuss, Antonio C Wolff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need to better measure and improve the quality of oncology care and improve communication with patients and other providers. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Registry (BCR) pilot evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of prospective data collection for quality assessment in daily clinical practice. Data were used to create and share treatment plans/summaries (TPSs) at the point of care.
METHODS: Using a web-based tool, 20 diverse practices entered clinical data on each new early-stage breast cancer patient into the BCR for 14 months (September 2009 through November 2010). The tool created individual TPSs that were shared with patients. Practices received practice-specific and aggregate BCR quality measures data, participated in a survey, and received a participation stipend.
RESULTS: Twenty practices entered 2014 patients into the BCR, collecting demographic, clinical, and treatment information. Fifty-two percent of practice participants replied to an end-of-pilot survey: 73% were satisfied with the BCR and web-based tool, 31% expressed concern regarding time and effort, and 52% reported additional practice costs during the pilot. Among those who created or shared the TPSs, 90% thought the documents improved oncologist-patient communication, and 95% favored using BCR data for practice quality improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective data collection for quality assessment is feasible and allows sharing of TPSs with patients at the point of care. Future efforts should focus on decreasing implementation burden to practices, broadening participation, examining costs, and, most importantly, assessing its effects on patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197186      PMCID: PMC3978173          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  25 in total

1.  The cancer survivorship care plan: health care in the context of cancer.

Authors:  Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  The quality oncology practice initiative: assessing and improving care within the medical oncology practice.

Authors:  Kristen McNiff
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mary Ann Burg; Ellen D S Lopez; Amy Dailey; Mary Elspeth Keller; Brendan Prendergast
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss; Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Peter D Eisenberg; Dean H Gesme; Joseph O Jacobson; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Jennifer J Padberg; John M Rainey; Jeff J Guo; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Failing to plan is planning to fail: improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans.

Authors:  Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The role of primary care physicians in advanced cancer care: perspectives of older patients and their oncologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth O'Toole; Mary M Step; Kathryn Engelhardt; Steven Lewis; Julia Hannum Rose
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. III. Impact on patient care.

Authors:  S H Woolf
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-12-13

9.  Compliance with consensus recommendations for systemic therapy is associated with improved survival of women with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicole Hébert-Croteau; Jacques Brisson; Jean Latreille; Michèle Rivard; Nadia Abdelaziz; Ginette Martin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Douglas W Blayney; Kristen McNiff; David Hanauer; Gretchen Miela; Denise Markstrom; Michael Neuss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Dori L Klemanski; Kristine K Browning; Jennifer Kue
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physician.

Authors:  Mary S McCabe; Ann H Partridge; Eva Grunfeld; Melissa M Hudson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.

Authors:  Anne Reb; Nora Ruel; Marwan Fakih; Lily Lai; Ravi Salgia; Betty Ferrell; Sagus Sampath; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Virginia Sun
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.398

4.  Connecting the Dots: Linking the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Needs of Survivors and Clinicians.

Authors:  A Blythe Ryerson; Christie Eheman; Timothy Styles; Randi Rycroft; Claire Snyder
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Challenges in the delivery of quality breast cancer care: initiation of adjuvant hormone therapy at an urban safety net hospital.

Authors:  Meaghan M Crowley; Molly E McCoy; Sharon M Bak; Sarah E Caron; Naomi Y Ko; Lisa A Kachnic; Faber Alvis; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  A framework for genomic biomarker actionability and its use in clinical decision making.

Authors:  Smruti J Vidwans; Michelle L Turski; Filip Janku; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Javier Munoz; Richard Schwab; Vivek Subbiah; Jordi Rodon; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-10-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.