Literature DB >> 11387362

Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways.

T J Smith1, B E Hillner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe the impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on improvement in oncology treatment processes or outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of the literature from 1966 to the present and a directed review of the literature.
RESULTS: Improvements have been demonstrated in compliance with evidence-based guidelines or evidence-based medicine, and in short-term length of stay, complication rates, and financial outcomes. The data suggest that patient satisfaction can be maintained despite a shorter length of stay. There has been one example of province-wide improvement in disease-free and overall survival of breast cancer patients coincident with the adoption of CPGS: The components of successful guidelines can be summarized as follows: (1) development is based on evidence, with the guideline formulated by key physicians in the group; (2) the guidelines are disseminated to all affected health care professionals for critique; (3) implementation includes direct feedback on performance to physicians or general feedback on system performance; and (4) there is accountability for performance according to the guidelines. This accountability can consist of voluntary peer pressure to conform to evidence-based medicine, and it does not require a financial reward or penalty.
CONCLUSION: Some attempts to improve practice have been moderately successful in achievement of reduced health care costs, reduced hospital length of stay, and possibly improved outcomes. Other methods that are still in use have been demonstrated to have little effect. Programs that have not succeeded have relied on voluntary change in practice behavior without incentives to change or have had no accountability component. Further research is needed to assess how guidelines are enacted in organizations other than those demonstrably committed to improvement, ways to improve compliance of health care providers who are not committed to change, and methods to improve accountability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11387362     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.11.2886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  59 in total

1.  Improving quality and addressing the rising costs of cancer care: two birds, one stone.

Authors:  Jason Luke; Joshua Mirkin; Peter Bach
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Breast Centers in Germany.

Authors:  Ute-Susann Albert; Uwe Wagner; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Cancer Treatment in Patients With HIV Infection and Non-AIDS-Defining Cancers: A Survey of US Oncologists.

Authors:  Gita Suneja; Matthew Boyer; Baligh R Yehia; Meredith S Shiels; Eric A Engels; Justin E Bekelman; Judith A Long
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Teams and teamwork during a cancer diagnosis: interdependency within and between teams.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Sallie Weaver; Veronica Chollette; Lawrence B Marks; Andrew Jacobs; Gordon Schiff; Carrie T Stricker; Suanna S Bruinooge; Eduardo Salas
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Clinical practice guideline implementation strategy patterns in Veterans Affairs primary care clinics.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Richard G Best; Jacqueline A Pugh
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  An informatics blueprint for healthcare quality information systems.

Authors:  Joyce C Niland; Layla Rouse; Douglas C Stahl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Frequency of adoption of practice management guidelines at trauma centers.

Authors:  Justin Sobrino; Sunni A Barnes; Nadine Dahr; Rustam Kudyakov; Candice Berryman; Avery B Nathens; Mark R Hemmila; Melanie Neal; Shahid Shafi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

8.  Variations in Guideline-Concordant Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy in Rural Georgia.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Kevin C Ward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?

Authors:  G Pentheroudakis; R Stahel; H Hansen; N Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Promoting evidence-based management of anemia in cancer patients: concurrent and discriminant validity of RESPOND, a web-based clinical guidance system based on the EORTC guidelines for supportive care in cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Van Erps; Matti Aapro; Karen MacDonald; Pierre Soubeyran; Matthew Turner; Hans Warrinnier; Tara Albrecht; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.