Literature DB >> 19487377

Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.

Douglas W Blayney1, Kristen McNiff, David Hanauer, Gretchen Miela, Denise Markstrom, Michael Neuss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) is a voluntary program developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) to aid oncology practices in quality self-assessment. Few academic cancer centers have been QOPI participants.
METHODS: We implemented the QOPI process at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, a large, hospital-based academic cancer center, and report our experience with five rounds of data collection. Patient medical records were selected using QOPI-specified procedures and abstracted locally; results were entered into an ASCO-maintained database and analyzed.
RESULTS: Abstractors who were not directly involved with patient care required an average of 62.3 minutes per medical record (4.7 minutes per data element) to abstract data. We found that compliance with quality measures was uniformly high when measures were structured into our electronic medical record. Results from other measures, including those measuring chemotherapy administration in the last 2 weeks of life, were initially markedly different from those reported by other QOPI participants. Our practice changed toward the QOPI national practice norm after a presentation of the results at a faculty research conference. We found that other measures were consistently greater than 90%, including disease-specific diagnosis and treatment measures.
CONCLUSION: Measuring and showing performance data to physicians was sufficient to change some aspects of physician behavior. Improvement in other measures requires structural practice changes. QOPI, an oncologist-developed system, can be adapted for use in practice improvement at an academic medical center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487377     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  42 in total

1.  Doing palliative care in the oncology office.

Authors:  M Jennifer Cheng; Lauren M King; Erin R Alesi; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Information technology interventions to improve cancer care quality: a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Care Symposium.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Stephen B Edge
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Evolution of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative supportive care quality measures portfolio and conformance at a Veterans Affairs medical center.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Michael J Kelley; Christina D Williams; Arif H Kamal
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Measuring and improving quality of care in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Douglas W Blayney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  National Collaborative to Improve Oncology Practice: The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Experience.

Authors:  Robert D Siegel; Steven B Clauser; Jean M Lynn
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Improving the quality of cancer care: crossroads or convergence?

Authors:  Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Partnering with payers for success: quality oncology practice initiative, blue cross blue shield of michigan, and the michigan oncology quality consortium.

Authors:  Douglas W Blayney; Philip J Stella; Thomas Ruane; Jane Martin; Beth Lavasseur; Thomas Leyden; Mary Malloy
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Optimizing the quality of breast cancer care at certified german breast centers: a benchmarking analysis for 2003-2009 with a particular focus on the interdisciplinary specialty of radiation oncology.

Authors:  Sara Y Brucker; Markus Wallwiener; Rolf Kreienberg; Walter Jonat; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Bamberg; Diethelm Wallwiener; Rainer Souchon
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: A report of University of Michigan's nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE).

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Qiaozhu Mei; James Law; Ritu Khanna; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Improving Care With a Portfolio of Physician-Led Cancer Quality Measures at an Academic Center.

Authors:  Julie Bryar Porter; Eben Lloyd Rosenthal; Marcy Winget; Andrea Segura Smith; Sridhar Belavadi Seshadri; Yohan Vetteth; Eileen F Kiamanesh; Amogh Badwe; Ranjana H Advani; Mark K Buyyounouski; Steven Coutre; Frederick Dirbas; Vasu Divi; Oliver Dorigo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Laura J Johnston; Lawrence David Recht; Joseph B Shrager; Eila C Skinner; Susan M Swetter; Brendan C Visser; Douglas W Blayney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.