Literature DB >> 23188217

Length and pressure of the reconstructed lower esophageal sphincter is determined by both crural closure and Nissen fundoplication.

Brian E Louie1, Seema Kapur, Maurice Blitz, Alexander S Farivar, Eric Vallières, Ralph W Aye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is comprised of: a wrap thought responsible for the lower esophageal sphincter function and crural closure performed to prevent herniation. We hypothesized gastroesophageal junction competence effected by Nissen fundoplication results from closure of the crural diaphragm and creation of the fundoplication.
METHODS: Patients with uncomplicated reflux undergoing Nissen fundoplication were prospectively enrolled. After hiatal dissection, patients were randomized to crural closure followed by fundoplication (group 1) or fundoplication followed by crural closure (group 2). Intra-operative high-resolution manometry collected sphincter pressure and length data after complete dissection and after each component repair.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients were randomized. When compared to the completely dissected hiatus, the mean sphincter length increased 1.3 cm (p < 0.001), and mean sphincter pressure was increased by 13.7 mmHg (p < 0.001). Groups 1 and 2 had similar sphincter length and pressure changes. Crural closure and fundal wrap contribute equally to sphincter length, although crural closure appears to contribute more to sphincter pressure.
CONCLUSION: The Nissen fundoplication restores the function of the gastroesophageal junction and thus the reflux barrier by means of two main components: the crural closure and the construction of a 360° fundal wrap. Each of these components is equally important in establishing both increased sphincter length and pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23188217     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2074-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Esophagogastric junction pressure topography after fundoplication.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; S Lin; M Manka; G Shi; R J Joehl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Restoration of normal distensive characteristics of the esophagogastric junction after fundoplication.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Jennifer Curry; Guoxiang Shi; Raymond J Joehl; James G Brasseur; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Transoral incisionless fundoplication 2.0 procedure using EsophyX™ for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Arul Immanuel; Matthew Schuchert; Zdenek Dubrava; Andrew Smith; Peter Nottle; David I Watson; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a problem of hiatal closure more than a problem of the wrap.

Authors:  F A Granderath; U M Schweiger; T Kamolz; R Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Electrical and mechanical activity in the human lower esophageal sphincter during diaphragmatic contraction.

Authors:  R K Mittal; D F Rochester; R W McCallum
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Paraoesophageal hiatus hernia: an important complication of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P G Devitt; P C Mitchell; P A Game
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The impact of gastric distension on the lower esophageal sphincter and its exposure to acid gastric juice.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Anand Tamhankar; Steven R DeMeester; Joerg Zehetner; Calvin Wu; John C Lipham; Jeffrey A Hagen; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Comparison of outcomes twelve years after antireflux surgery or omeprazole maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  Lars Lundell; Pekka Miettinen; Helge E Myrvold; Jan G Hatlebakk; Lene Wallin; Cecilia Engström; Risto Julkunen; Madeline Montgomery; Anders Malm; Tore Lind; Anders Walan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Determinants of gastroesophageal junction incompetence: hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter, or both?

Authors:  S Sloan; A W Rademaker; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; M Albertucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  13 in total

1.  Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.

Authors:  James M Tatum; Evan Alicuben; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Kamran Samakar; Caitlin C Houghton; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.

Authors:  Kais A Rona; Jessica Reynolds; Katrin Schwameis; Joerg Zehetner; Kamran Samakar; Paul Oh; David Vong; Kulmeet Sandhu; Namir Katkhouda; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does Treatment of the Hiatus Influence the Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Chronic GERD?

Authors:  Matías Mihura Irribarra; Sandra Blitz; Candice L Wilshire; Anee Sophia Jackson; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Christy M Dunst; Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Crural closure, not fundoplication, results in a significant decrease in lower esophageal sphincter distensibility.

Authors:  Mikhail Attaar; Bailey Su; Harry Wong; Zachary Callahan; Kristine Kuchta; Stephen Stearns; John G Linn; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Effect of Increased Intra-abdominal Pressure on the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stefano Siboni; Luigi Bonavina; Benjamin D Rogers; Ciara Egan; Edoardo Savarino; C Prakash Gyawali; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.174

Review 7.  [Antireflux operations: indications and techniques].

Authors:  H Feussner; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes.

Authors:  Kais A Rona; James M Tatum; Joerg Zehetner; Katrin Schwameis; Carol Chow; Kamran Samakar; Adrian Dobrowolsky; Caitlin C Houghton; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Authors:  F P Buckley; Reginald C W Bell; Kate Freeman; Stephanie Doggett; Rachel Heidrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Crural Closure improves Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in GERD patients with Hiatal Hernia.

Authors:  Katrin Schwameis; Milena Nikolic; Deivis G Morales Castellano; Ariane Steindl; Sarah Macheck; M Riegler; Ivan Kristo; Barbara Zörner; Sebastian F Schoppmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.